Sheet Path Intersection Device with Rotatable Idler Rollers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sheet transport devices face challenges in accommodating oversized and overlength sheets without increasing their size, leading to user dissatisfaction and a high rate of sheet jams, especially at intersections where complex designs result in higher costs and vulnerability to component failure.

Innovation Solution

The use of a simplified structure with two fixed-position drive rollers and two movable idler rollers that pivot about the center of the sheet intersection, allowing for multiple drive nips to be formed to drive sheets through intersections in either direction, reducing the probability of sheet jams and maintaining a compact architecture.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If complex intersection designs are used to handle oversized sheets, then sheet handling capability is improved, but device size and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesheet handling capabilityVSAvoiddevice size
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic roller positioning where idle rollers can rotate between different operational positions to accommodate sheets of varying sizes. The rotatable support structure allows the idle rollers to move from a retracted position (for compactness) to an extended position (for handling oversized sheets), enabling the device to adapt its configuration based on sheet dimensions without permanently increasing device size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If more rollers are added to handle overlength sheets, then sheet transport capability is improved, but reliability decreases due to more components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesheet transport capabilityVSAvoidcomponent failure rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The idle rollers serve multiple functions: they act as support rollers for overlength sheets, function as drive rollers when engaged with the drive roller, and can be retracted when not needed. This multi-functionality allows a single set of rollers to handle various sheet sizes and transport scenarios, reducing the total number of components required while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The rotatable support structure enables the idle rollers to dynamically change their operational role and position. By rotating the support, the system can engage or disengage idle rollers from the drive roller, allowing the same physical components to serve different purposes based on operational requirements, thereby reducing component count while maintaining capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If fixed roller positions are used, then device simplicity is improved, but adaptability to different sheet sizes decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice simplicityVSAvoidsheet size accommodation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a rotatable support structure that allows idle rollers to move between fixed mounting positions while maintaining simple fixed mounting points. The simplicity is preserved in the mounting mechanism, while adaptability is achieved through the rotational capability that repositions rollers along an arc path, enabling accommodation of different sheet sizes without complex adjustable mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively increases the size of sheets that can be accommodated without increasing the device's size, while minimizing sheet jams and maintaining a compact, cost-effective design.

Implementation Method 1

contact between the first idle roller and the first drive roller forms a first drive nip. Contact between the second idle roller and the second drive roller forms a second drive nip.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS12129146B2Sheet path intersection device
Publication Date: 2024.10.29 XEROX CORP
  • US12129146B2 patent drawing
  • US12129146B2 patent drawing
  • US12129146B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatuses include, among other components, a pair of opposing drive rollers, a pair of opposing idle rollers, and a rotatable support operatively connected to the axles of the idle rollers. Axles of the drive rollers and the idle rollers are positioned along a circle. The axles of the drive rollers and the idle rollers alternate along the circle. Also, rotation of the rotatable support moves the idle rollers along the circle until the idle rollers contact the drive rollers. Each of the idle rollers is positioned by the rotatable support to only contact a single drive roller at a time.