Sheet Specimen Cutting Punch for Rapid Crack Preparation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing devices for preparing sheet specimens are costly and time-consuming due to the use of cyclic loads for introducing cracks, which prolongs the preparation process.

Innovation Solution

A device with a cutting punch and pressing element that directly forms cracks in sheet specimens, using a beveled lower end and central vertical groove, allowing for rapid crack formation without cyclic loading.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If cyclic loads are used to introduce cracks in sheet specimens, then the cracks are properly formed for mechanical testing, but the preparation time and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrack formation qualityVSAvoidpreparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the cyclic loading mechanical system with a direct cutting mechanical system. Instead of applying repeated mechanical loads to fatigue-crack the specimen, a cutting punch with a specific geometry (beveled lower end and central vertical groove) directly cuts the crack into the specimen in a single action, eliminating the time-consuming cyclic loading process while maintaining crack quality suitable for mechanical testing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter of crack introduction from a process-based approach (cyclic loading duration and intensity) to a geometry-based approach (cutting punch shape and cutting force). By modifying the punch geometry with a beveled lower end and central vertical groove, the crack formation is achieved through a single cutting action rather than repeated loading cycles, dramatically reducing preparation time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If cyclic loads are used to introduce cracks in sheet specimens, then the cracks are properly formed for mechanical testing, but the equipment cost and operational cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrack formation qualityVSAvoidpreparation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive cyclic loading equipment and procedures with a simple cutting punch mechanism. The cutting punch can be manufactured as a straightforward tooling component, eliminating the need for complex fatigue testing equipment, specialized laboratories, and trained operators, thereby significantly reducing both capital equipment costs and operational expenses

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting punch is designed as a simple, potentially disposable or easily replaceable tooling component. Rather than investing in expensive, durable cyclic loading equipment that requires maintenance and calibration, the patent uses an inexpensive cutting punch that can be quickly manufactured or replaced if worn, reducing overall preparation costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Productivity

If a simple cutting punch is used to form cracks, then preparation time is reduced, but the crack geometry may not be suitable for subsequent tests

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepreparation speedVSAvoidcrack geometry precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting punch is designed with localized geometric features specifically tailored to produce the desired crack morphology. The beveled lower end and central vertical groove create a specific stress distribution and cutting pattern that generates cracks with the appropriate geometry for subsequent mechanical tests, ensuring that the critical local region (the crack tip and immediate vicinity) has the required precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting punch geometry is pre-designed and pre-configured to automatically produce the correct crack shape during the cutting action. The beveled lower end and central vertical groove are predetermined geometric features that guide the crack formation process, ensuring that the crack geometry is appropriate for subsequent testing without requiring additional adjustment or post-processing steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device significantly reduces preparation time and costs by enabling efficient crack introduction, producing specimens that accurately replicate fatigue pre-cracks for mechanical testing.

Implementation Method 1

a cutting punch to produce sheared cracks or sharp notches, such as sharp notches with a radius similar to a crack, at the end of the cut area in said sheet specimen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear stress: Shear Stress

Data Source

PatentUS20260063523A1Device for Preparing Sheet Specimens
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 FUNDACIO EURECAT
  • US20260063523A1 patent drawing
  • US20260063523A1 patent drawing
  • US20260063523A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The device for preparing sheet specimens comprises a base (1) for placing on it a sheet specimen (2) and a cutting punch (3) for cutting sheared cracks or sharp notches in said sheet specimen (2). Preferably, said cutting punch (3) comprises a beveled lower end (31) and/or a central vertical groove (32). Permits the cracks to be formed cutting directly the sheet, and not by cyclic loading, so that the preparation of the sheet specimen takes a reduced time in comparison with the conventional devices.