Image Processing Apparatus for Retail Shelf Checking Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In retail and warehouse settings, it is difficult to determine if employees have checked the expiry dates of commodities on shelves, as there is no effective method to manage or verify the completion of this task.

Innovation Solution

An image processing apparatus that uses cameras and a processor to capture and analyze images of shelves, detect the presence of employees, recognize articles, and determine if they have been checked, generating lists of checked and unchecked items, and alerting staff to incomplete checks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional manual checking methods are used, then device complexity is low, but reliability of checking work verification is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification of checking workVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical checking processes with an automated image processing system that uses cameras to capture shelf images and computer processors to analyze them, thereby improving verification reliability while reducing manual labor complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-verification by automatically detecting whether employees have completed checking work through image analysis, where the system monitors itself and provides automatic verification without requiring additional manual inspection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of information

If no checking work management system is implemented, then device complexity remains low, but loss of information about checked items occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation on checked itemsVSAvoidmanagement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by capturing images of employees checking items, analyzing these images to determine completion status, and providing feedback information about which items have been checked and which remain unchecked, thereby preventing information loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary image processing system that mediates between the physical checking action and the verification process, using captured images as intermediate data to track and manage checking work completion status

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If manual patrol methods are used, then ease of operation is high, but productivity in monitoring all commodities is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring coverageVSAvoidoperation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system substitutes manual patrol operations with automated image capture and processing mechanisms, enabling continuous monitoring of all commodities without requiring constant human presence, thereby improving productivity while maintaining operational simplicity through automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12106566B2Image processing apparatus that manages checking work performed on articles and image processing method thereof
Publication Date: 2024.10.01 TOSHIBA TEC KK
  • US12106566B2 patent drawing
  • US12106566B2 patent drawing
  • US12106566B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to an embodiment, an image processing apparatus includes an input interface, a memory, and a processor. The input interface obtains a captured image obtained by imaging an imaging area including the shelf on which the article is arranged. The memory stores an article list showing the article arranged on the shelf. The processor detects the article for which the person in charge has done the checking work from the captured image obtained by the input interface. The processor outputs information indicating the article for which the person in charge has not done the checking work on the basis of the article list and a checked-article list showing the article for which the person in charge has done the checking work.