Shelf-Ready Shipper Display System with Weakness Zones

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current retail display systems are inefficient in terms of assembly, shipping, and environmental sustainability, as they often require significant time and material, and fail to protect graphics during transit while allowing easy consumer access and product visibility.

Innovation Solution

A shelf-ready shipper display system comprising a tray portion, a hood portion, and an optional reinforcement panel that can be easily converted from a shipping configuration to a display configuration, using foldable substrates to minimize material usage and maximize structural integrity and product visibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional display systems use multiple separate components for shipping and display, then product protection during transit is improved, but assembly complexity and material usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct protection during transitVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the shipping container and display structure into a single integrated unit. The box structure serves dual purposes: protecting products during shipping and displaying them at the point of sale. This eliminates the need for separate shipping containers and display fixtures, reducing assembly complexity while maintaining protection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The display system is designed to perform multiple functions: it acts as a shipping container, a protective enclosure, a display fixture, and a shelf-ready unit. This multi-functionality reduces the number of components needed and simplifies the overall system while ensuring product protection throughout the supply chain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Strength

If traditional display systems use substantial materials for structural integrity, then strength is improved, but environmental impact and material cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidmaterial usage
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs thin-walled box structures that provide adequate structural integrity through optimized geometry and folding mechanisms rather than thick materials. The design uses minimal material while maintaining strength through clever structural design, reducing environmental impact and material cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The display system transitions between different structural states (flat-packed for shipping, erected for display) by changing geometric parameters. This allows the same minimal material to provide different levels of structural integrity as needed for shipping versus display phases, reducing overall material usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Illumination intensity

If graphics are applied to the display surface, then product visibility and advertising effectiveness are improved, but protection of graphics during shipping becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct visibilityVSAvoidgraphics protection during shipping
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Graphics are applied to the box structure before it is put into service for shipping and display. This preliminary application ensures graphics are protected during shipping by the box structure itself, and remain visible during display. The graphics are integrated into the design from the outset rather than added later.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses printed or coated surfaces on the box structure that combine structural material with graphic elements. This integration ensures graphics are protected by the same material that provides structural integrity, eliminating the need for separate protective layers while maintaining visibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Ease of operation

If the display is designed to be easily assembled and converted, then ease of operation is improved, but structural strength may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of assembly and conversionVSAvoidstructural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The display system is divided into modular box units that can be easily assembled and converted. Each module maintains structural integrity through standardized connections and folding mechanisms, allowing easy assembly without compromising overall strength. The segmentation enables simple conversion between shipping and display configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8376141B2Shelf-ready shipper display system
Publication Date: 2013.02.19 WESTROCK SHARED SERVICES LLC
  • US8376141B2 patent drawing
  • US8376141B2 patent drawing
  • US8376141B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A shelf-ready shipper display system having a tray portion, a hood portion, and one or more zones of weakness that enable the hood portion to be separated from the tray portion so that the shipper display system can be converted from a shipping configuration to a display configuration. In certain embodiments, the shipper display system is made from a single blank. In some embodiments, the shipper display system includes a reinforcement panel that is also capable of being separated from the tray portion as the shipper display system is converted from the shipping configuration and to the display configuration.