Self-Assembled Shell-Based Architected Materials

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for fabricating lightweight, low-density materials with high stiffness and mechanical resilience are limited by the need for periodic architectures and additive manufacturing techniques, which restrict scalability and introduce defects, making it challenging to achieve optimal combinations of mechanical properties such as high stiffness-to-density ratios and flaw tolerance.

Innovation Solution

The development of shell-based materials with non-periodic architectures formed via self-assembly processes, using spinodal decomposition of polymeric emulsions to create bi-continuous templates that are then coated with materials like alumina, allowing for tunable morphology and mechanical properties, and enabling scalable fabrication of materials with ultralow densities and high resilience.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If additive manufacturing techniques are used to fabricate lightweight materials with periodic architectures, then deterministic 3D architectures with nanoscale resolution can be achieved, but scalability is restricted and defects are introduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenanoscale resolutionVSAvoidscalability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs self-assembly of block copolymers that spontaneously organize into periodic nanostructures without external intervention during the assembly process. The block copolymers self-direct their phase separation to form the desired 3D architectures, eliminating the need for complex additive manufacturing equipment while maintaining nanoscale precision and enabling scalable production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the physical-chemical parameters of the system by using block copolymer composition, molecular weight ratios, and solvent conditions to control the self-assembly process. By adjusting these parameters, the system achieves deterministic nanoscale architectures through thermodynamic equilibrium rather than kinetic control, enabling both high precision and scalability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Shape

If additive manufacturing processes are used to create architected materials, then highly selected three dimensional architectures can be achieved, but the materials fail to tolerate large forces and deformation without deterioration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethree dimensional architectureVSAvoidtolerance for deformation
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The self-assembled block copolymer structures inherently form curved, rounded interfaces between phases rather than sharp edges or straight lines. This curvature distributes stress more evenly throughout the material architecture, preventing stress concentration points and enabling the material to tolerate large deformations while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Productivity

If self-assembly processes are used to fabricate lightweight materials, then high throughput volumes and scalability can be achieved, but control over morphology and mechanical properties is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehigh throughput volumesVSAvoidcontrol over morphology
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention achieves precise morphological control by systematically varying block copolymer parameters including block length ratios, molecular weights, and chemical composition. These parameter changes directly control the self-assembly outcome, enabling deterministic selection of 3D architectures (such as gyroid, lamellar, or hexagonal phases) while maintaining scalability and high throughput production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in materials with exceptional mechanical resilience, tunable stiffness, and directional properties, surpassing traditional truss-based architectures in energy absorption and stiffness-to-density response, while avoiding stress concentrations and maintaining performance across multiple scales and volumes.

Implementation Method 1

self-assembly of polymer emulsions via spinodal decomposition (i.e., phase separation) is used to generate a scaffold that serves as a template

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpinodal decomposition:

Implementation Method 2

conformal coating with one or more materials of interest

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConformal deposition: Deposition (physical)

Data Source

PatentUS12006404B2Self-assembly of shell-based architected materials
Publication Date: 2024.06.11 CALIFORNIA INST OF TECH
  • US12006404B2 patent drawing
  • US12006404B2 patent drawing
  • US12006404B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an aspect, provided herein are low density materials, including shell-based materials, with three-dimensional architectures formed, in part, via self-assembly processes. Shell-based materials of some embodiments exhibit a combination of ultralow density (e.g., ≤100 mg cm−3 and optionally ≤10 100 mg cm−3) and non-periodic architectures characterized by low defect densities and geometries avoiding stress concentrations. Low density shell based materials of some embodiments have architectures characterized by small curvatures and lack of straight edges providing enhance mechanical response. In some embodiments, for example, the present low density materials, including shell-based materials, providing a combination target mechanical properties including high stiffness-to-density ratios, mechanical resilience and tolerance for deformation.