Shelled Generative CAD for Lightweight Crash Simulation Meshes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current generative design methods for crash simulations result in heavy, stiff solid state designs that are computationally expensive and unwieldy, lacking an efficient mechanism for producing better-performing lightweight designs suitable for both additive manufacturing and CAE crash simulations.

Innovation Solution

A lightweight shelled generative design with an internal support structure is developed, allowing for efficient simulation and validation, utilizing a workflow that creates a representative CAD part and associative CAE crash simulation model, reducing simulation run time and mass while avoiding re-coater interference and powder trapping.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a solid state generative design is used for crash simulations, then structural strength and stiffness are improved, but weight increases and computational cost becomes excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoiddesign weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies shell-based generative design instead of solid state design, creating lightweight shell structures with optimized thickness distributions that maintain structural strength while dramatically reducing weight. The shell design allows for thin-walled structures that preserve crashworthiness without the excessive mass of solid components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fundamental design parameter from solid volume to shell thickness, enabling weight reduction while maintaining structural integrity. By optimizing shell thickness distributions and using shell elements in simulations, the design achieves better weight-strength trade-offs compared to solid state designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a solid state generative design is used for crash simulations, then structural integrity is improved, but simulation run time and computational resources increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidsimulation run time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Shell elements have fewer degrees of freedom compared to solid elements, resulting in smaller system matrices and faster solution times. The patent leverages this computational advantage by designing with shells, achieving both structural integrity and reduced simulation run time of up to 70% compared to solid state designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

By changing from solid to shell formulation, the patent reduces the complexity of the simulation model while maintaining reliability. Shell elements require less computational resources and shorter solution times while preserving the essential structural behavior needed for crash simulation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Weight of moving object

If a shelled generative design with internal support structure is used, then weight is reduced and processing time decreases, but manufacturing complexity may increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent weightVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by varying shell thickness throughout the structure, concentrating material where needed for strength and using thinner sections where less support is required. This localized material distribution optimizes both weight and manufacturability, creating designs that are lightweight yet efficient to produce via additive manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates internal support structures within the shelled design, creating nested geometries that provide structural reinforcement while maintaining overall lightweight characteristics. These internal features are integrated into the shell structure, optimizing both performance and manufacturability through additive manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Data Source

PatentUS11989491B2Generative shell design for simulations
Publication Date: 2024.05.21 AUTODESK INC
  • US11989491B2 patent drawing
  • US11989491B2 patent drawing
  • US11989491B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system provide the ability to generate models. A generative shelled base is created as a hollow computer-aided design (CAD) design. A t-spline mid-surface shell is created from the generative shelled base, which is then used to create a shell mesh model. A t-spline solid body is created from the generative shelled base, which is used to create an internal support structure that is converted into a shell CAD geometry, which is used to create a support structure mid-surface shell. The support structure mid-surface shell is combined with the shell mesh model into a generative mid-surface mesh that is used in a computer-aided engineering (CAE) crash simulation. The generated shelled base is combined with the shell CAD geometry into a generative shelled solid that is utilized in an additive build simulation.