Second Harmonic Generation Screening for Allosteric Modulators

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for identifying allosteric modulators are laborious and inefficient, as they require sorting through numerous potential drug candidates to distinguish between competitive inhibitors, non-competitive inhibitors, and allosteric modulators, with conventional screening techniques often producing ambiguous results due to nonspecific binding.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a library of candidate biochemical entities with a common scaffold core, where conformational changes in intrinsically disordered proteins are measured using second harmonic generation (SHG) to generate signatures, allowing for the selection of drug candidates based on signal differences indicative of improved pharmacological properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If conventional screening techniques are used to identify allosteric modulators, then a large number of potential drug candidates can be tested, but the process becomes laborious and produces ambiguous results due to nonspecific binding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of candidate drugs testedVSAvoidspecificity of binding detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional mechanical/chemical binding assays with second harmonic generation (SHG), an optical technique that detects conformational changes in proteins. This substitution allows for more precise and specific detection of allosteric modulator binding, eliminating the ambiguity of nonspecific binding results while maintaining the ability to screen large numbers of candidates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes optical signal changes (second harmonic generation signals) to detect and differentiate between specific binding events and nonspecific binding. The SHG technique produces measurable signal changes that correspond to conformational changes in the target protein, providing clear, unambiguous detection of true positives among the large pool of candidates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

2Reliability

If conventional activity assays are used to identify allosteric modulators, then binding can be detected, but the mechanism of action becomes laborious to determine

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection of bindingVSAvoidtime required to determine mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces time-consuming multi-protein activity assays with a direct optical measurement technique (SHG) that detects conformational changes in the target protein's binding pocket. This substitution provides reliable binding detection while dramatically reducing the time required to determine mechanism of action, as the technique directly measures the structural change without requiring complex functional assays

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If conventional screening is used to sort inhibitors, then candidates can be evaluated, but the complexity of distinguishing between competitive, non-competitive, and allosteric modulators increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to evaluate different inhibitor typesVSAvoidcomplexity of sorting process
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex multi-step sorting procedures with a single optical measurement technique (SHG) that directly detects conformational changes. This substitution simplifies the entire screening process, allowing simultaneous evaluation of competitive, non-competitive, and allosteric modulators through their distinct conformational effects, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining comprehensive evaluation capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses distinct optical signal patterns (second harmonic generation signals) to differentiate between various types of inhibitors. Each inhibitor type produces a characteristic signal pattern corresponding to its specific binding mode and conformational effect, enabling easy distinction and classification without complex analytical procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables efficient screening of drug candidates by distinguishing between candidates with improved pharmacological properties through measurable conformational changes, reducing the complexity of identifying effective allosteric modulators.

Implementation Method 1

measuring a first conformational state of an intrinsically disordered protein, thereby generating a baseline; measuring a second conformational state of the intrinsically disordered protein... the measuring steps comprise measurements of second harmonic generation (SHG)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSecond harmonic generation: Second Harmonic Generation

Data Source

PatentEP3008465B1Method of screening candidate biochemical entities targeting a target biochemical entity
Publication Date: 2019.08.07 BIODESY
  • EP3008465B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1E
  • EP3008465B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP3008465B1 patent drawingFigure 2C

AI summary

Described herein are methods useful for screening candidate biochemical entities targeting a target biochemical entity and methods useful for identifying a binding moiety for a target biochemical entity. The invention provides methods of screening drug candidates targeting a target biomolecule, comprising selecting a drug candidate based on a signal difference between a first signal and a second signal. The signal difference indicates a difference in an in vivo or in vitro pharmacological property. The first signal is produced upon binding between the target biomolecule and a first candidate by contacting the target biomolecule with the first candidate, and the second signal is produced upon binding between the target biomolecule and a second candidate by contacting the target biomolecule with the second candidate.