Shielded Connector Vertical Wall Finger Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Shielded connectors face challenges in maintaining effective electromagnetic interference (EMI) performance as signaling frequencies increase, due to increased power requirements and sensitivity to external noise, with existing designs often inhibiting signal trace routing and emitting EMI.

Innovation Solution

A connector design featuring a vertical wall that engages a shield on three sides of the housing, coupled to a ground plane, with a plurality of fingers spaced to minimize EMI radiation, allowing for reliable grounding and flexible signal routing while maintaining high EMI performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If signaling frequency is increased to achieve higher data rates, then productivity is improved, but electromagnetic interference performance deteriorates due to increased EMI radiation and sensitivity to external noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata rateVSAvoidEMI performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The shield is segmented into multiple sections with gaps between them, allowing signal traces to pass through while maintaining EMI shielding effectiveness. The vertical wall is divided into multiple fingers spaced apart, creating a segmented structure that reduces EMI radiation while preserving grounding functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the connector are assigned different functions: the vertical wall provides localized grounding and shielding where EMI is most critical, while gaps and openings are positioned specifically to allow signal trace routing. The shield structure is optimized locally to balance EMI protection with signal transmission requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If a continuous shield structure is used to improve EMI performance, then EMI shielding is improved, but signal trace routing becomes difficult and device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEMI shieldingVSAvoidsignal trace routing
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The continuous shield is replaced with a segmented structure featuring gaps and spaced fingers. This segmentation allows signal traces to route through the shield structure without requiring complex bypass designs, while the segmented shield maintains EMI shielding effectiveness through distributed grounding points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The shield structure transitions from a two-dimensional planar shield to a three-dimensional vertical wall with fingers extending in multiple directions. This dimensional change allows signal traces to pass through gaps in the vertical wall while the fingers provide distributed EMI shielding along the signal path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If fingers are spaced closer together to improve EMI performance, then EMI shielding is improved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase and signal routing flexibility decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEMI shieldingVSAvoidfinger spacing
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Rather than requiring uniformly close spacing of all fingers, the design uses a moderate spacing that is sufficient for the intended frequency range. This partial action approach achieves adequate EMI shielding without the excessive manufacturing precision requirements that would result from uniformly tight spacing throughout the entire structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides improved EMI performance and flexible signal routing by ensuring a consistent shield connection to the ground plane, reducing EMI radiation and allowing for closer finger spacing to manage higher signaling frequencies effectively.

Implementation Method 1

A connector with a housing positioned in a shield includes a vertical wall that engages the shield on three sides of housing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic shielding: Faraday Cage

Implementation Method 2

The vertical wall may include a lip that can be surface mounted directly on a circuit board and coupled to a ground plane thereof

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical grounding: Earthing

Data Source

PatentUS8992254B2Integrated shielded connector
Publication Date: 2015.03.31 MOLEX INC
  • US8992254B2 patent drawing
  • US8992254B2 patent drawing
  • US8992254B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A connector includes a housing positioned in a cage. A vertical wall is positioned around the housing and is soldered to a printed circuit board that is supporting the connector. The vertical wall includes a plurality of fingers that are configured to engage the cage. The fingers are positioned at intervals such that the distance between the fingers acts to control the frequencies of EMI that emit from the connector.