Shielded CPW Bridges for Scalable Qubit Routing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The scalability of quantum computing systems is limited by complex interconnect and routing schemes in superconducting qubits, which hinder efficient communication and data transfer between qubits.

Innovation Solution

The use of metamaterial waveguides with periodic arrays of lumped element resonators and shielded bridges in quantum computing circuits enables controlled communication between qubits by defining a bandgap within the operating bandwidth, allowing for adjustable communication distances and reduced crosstalk.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional interconnect and routing schemes are used in superconducting qubits, then qubit communication is achieved, but device complexity increases and scalability is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovescalabilityVSAvoidinterconnect and routing schemes
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The waveguide is segmented into discrete sections with different impedance characteristics (50-ohm sections and high-impedance sections with resonators). This segmentation allows the system to achieve both simple routing and controlled communication by dividing the waveguide into functional zones rather than using complex continuous routing schemes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Lumped element resonators are introduced as intermediary components that couple to the waveguide at specific locations. These resonators mediate the interaction between qubits by providing controlled coupling paths, enabling scalable qubit connectivity without requiring direct complex interconnects between all qubit pairs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Length of moving object

If qubits communicate over longer distances, then communication range increases, but signal loss increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication distanceVSAvoidsignal loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically controls coupling strength between qubits and the waveguide by adjusting the frequency of the resonators. By tuning the resonator frequencies to match the qubit frequencies, strong coupling is achieved over longer distances, while off-resonant coupling provides isolation. This dynamic control allows long-distance communication when needed while maintaining low loss through selective coupling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The impedance parameters of the waveguide are changed by introducing high-impedance sections with resonators at specific locations. These parameter changes create regions of strong field confinement and controlled coupling, allowing signals to be transmitted over longer distances with reduced loss by concentrating energy in specific zones rather than allowing continuous propagation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If more qubits are added to increase system complexity, then computational capability increases, but crosstalk between qubits increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of qubitsVSAvoidcrosstalk
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Different sections of the waveguide are assigned different local qualities - some sections have resonators for strong coupling, others have different impedance for isolation. This local quality variation allows multiple qubits to coexist on the same waveguide by providing localized coupling regions separated by isolation regions, enabling scalable qubit arrays without increasing crosstalk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The waveguide is segmented into discrete coupling zones, each associated with specific qubits. By placing resonators at specific locations and creating high-impedance sections between them, the system segments the communication paths, allowing multiple qubits to operate simultaneously with minimal crosstalk by confining interactions to specific localized regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the scalability of quantum computing systems by allowing for controlled qubit communication and reduced crosstalk, enabling efficient data transfer and increased complexity in quantum circuits while maintaining low loss and disorder.

Implementation Method 1

The resonators create a bandgap within an operating bandwidth of the waveguide wherein all wavelengths within the bandgap are larger than geometrical extents of each of the resonators

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBandgap:

Implementation Method 2

the ground bridge is configured to shield the signal bridge from crosstalk between the signal bridge and the separate signal conductor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic shielding: Faraday Cage

Implementation Method 3

Superconducting qubits based on Josephson junctions conventionally operate and communicate at microwave frequencies (2-10 GHz)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic wave propagation: Waveguide

Data Source

PatentUS11824248B2Shielded bridges for quantum circuits
Publication Date: 2023.11.21 CALIFORNIA INST OF TECH
  • US11824248B2 patent drawing
  • US11824248B2 patent drawing
  • US11824248B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A shielded bridge for a coplanar waveguide (CPW) includes a signal bridge extending from a first terminal of the CPW to a second terminal of the CPW. The signal bridge has a raised central portion that extends over a separate signal conductor. The shielded bridge for the CPW also includes a ground bridge extending from a first ground plane on a first side of the separate signal conductor to a second ground plane on a second side of the separate signal conductor. The ground bridge is positioned between the signal bridge and the separate signal conductor.