Shielded Electronics Crate Locking Structure for TEMPEST Security

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing high-security crates for electronic equipment face challenges in providing robust electromagnetic shielding, preventing unauthorized access, and resisting brute force attacks while meeting TEMPEST standards for signal attenuation and physical security.

Innovation Solution

A TEMPEST-grade electromagnetically shielded electronics crate with a locking mechanism featuring a locking bolt with two corresponding openings, a locking lever operable from outside, a linear motion mechanism with a guiding track, and a dual locking bolt configuration, along with an electromagnetically sealing gasket to enhance security and resistance against attacks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a locking mechanism is placed inside the crate for protection, then security against physical attacks is improved, but the complexity of the locking mechanism increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity against physical attacksVSAvoidlocking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is nested inside the crate body, with the locking bolt housed within the crate structure. The locking lever operates from the outside through a window or opening, while the actual locking components remain protected inside. This nesting approach protects the locking mechanism from external attacks while maintaining operational simplicity through the external lever interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Reliability

If a locking bolt with two openings is used, then security against brute force attacks is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity against brute force attacksVSAvoidlocking bolt complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking bolt is segmented into two separate openings instead of a single hole. Each opening can be independently engaged or disengaged, providing redundant security paths. This segmentation creates multiple failure modes that would need to be simultaneously overcome for a brute force attack to succeed, while the bolt itself remains a relatively simple component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If the locking mechanism is made more secure with multiple components, then protection against unauthorized access is improved, but the ease of operation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection against unauthorized accessVSAvoidlocking mechanism operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple locking functions are merged into a single locking lever operation. The lever simultaneously controls the locking bolt engagement, the opening alignment, and the overall locking state. This consolidation allows the user to secure or release the crate with a single simple motion, despite the presence of multiple security features and components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP4654770A1Electromagnetically shielded electronics crate
Publication Date: 2025.11.26 TARGET ENCLOSURE AB
  • EP4654770A1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1b
  • EP4654770A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4654770A1 patent drawingFigure 3a

AI summary

A TEMPEST-grade electromagnetically shielded electronics crate (10) comprises a body (20) and a drawer (30). The drawer is arranged to be locked by a latch mechanism (70) and a locking bolt (52). The locking bolt (52) is configured to engage with two openings (36; 46) which, in the locked state line up with said locking bolt (52).