Shielded Three-Layer Patterned Ground Structure for EMI Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Hard disk drives (HDDs) face electromagnetic interference (EMI) issues due to common mode current flowing through conductive traces on printed circuit boards (PCBs), which existing solutions like surface mounted common-mode filters either fail to address effectively or compromise signal integrity.

Innovation Solution

A shielded three-layer patterned ground structure in PCBs, featuring a middle shield laterally spaced by a moat filled with dielectric material, with a top shield having distinct portions over the moat, and conductive traces between these portions, reduces common mode current and EMI noise without impacting differential signal integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If a surface mounted common-mode filter is used to correct EMI, then EMI is reduced, but signal integrity is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEMIVSAvoidsignal integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The harmful common-mode current is extracted and redirected through the patterned ground shield structure. The PGS provides a dedicated return path for common-mode current that is separated from the differential signal traces, removing the harmful effect without affecting the signal integrity of the differential pair.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patterned ground shield acts as an intermediary structure between the differential traces and the reference ground plane. It provides a controlled impedance path that mediates the common-mode current flow, preventing it from coupling into the signal traces while maintaining proper signal reference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If connection changes are made to address common mode current, then EMI is reduced, but space requirements and signal integrity are impacted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommon mode currentVSAvoidspace requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The solution moves from a two-dimensional trace layout to a three-dimensional shielded structure by adding vertical separation with dielectric layers. The patterned ground shield is positioned in a different vertical plane from the differential traces, allowing EMI reduction without increasing the horizontal footprint of the PCB.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patterned ground shield structure is nested within the existing PCB layer structure. The PGS is embedded between the differential traces and the reference ground plane, utilizing the available vertical space within the standard PCB stackup without requiring additional external components or increased PCB area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Ease of manufacture

If PCB layer count is reduced to four layers for cost reduction, then manufacturing cost decreases, but EMI control becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecostVSAvoidEMI noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patterned ground shield layer serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides a reference plane for differential signals, creates a shield against common-mode noise, defines controlled impedance paths, and acts as a ground reference. This multi-functionality allows effective EMI control in a four-layer design without requiring additional dedicated shielding layers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Rather than providing continuous ground coverage, the ground plane is locally patterned only where needed beneath and adjacent to the differential traces. This localized grounding approach provides EMI protection and controlled impedance where required while leaving other areas open for routing or cost reduction, optimizing the balance between performance and manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively reduces common mode current and EMI noise in PCBs, lowering costs and maintaining signal integrity, and can be applied to both HDDs and solid-state devices.

Implementation Method 1

the patterned ground shield is laterally spaced from the middle shield by a moat, wherein the moat is filled with dielectric material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical insulation: Dielectric

Implementation Method 2

A shielded three-layer patterned ground structure in PCBs... reduces common mode current and EMI noise

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic shielding: Faraday Cage

Data Source

PatentUS9786331B1Shielded three-layer patterned ground structure
Publication Date: 2017.10.10 WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US9786331B1 patent drawing
  • US9786331B1 patent drawing
  • US9786331B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure generally relates to a shielded three-layer patterned ground structure in a PCB. The PCB may be disposed in a hard disk drive. To reduce costs, PCBs are being made with only four total layers separated by dielectric material. Conductive traces in PCBs can have the problem of common mode current flowing through the traces and thus increasing the magnitude of EMI noise. By providing a shielded three-layer patterned ground structure, not only is the cost reduced, but so is the common mode current and the magnitude of EMI noise, all without any negative impact to the differential signal.