Transmission Shift Locking Mechanism for Unauthorized Movement Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current safety features, such as park-lock systems and brake transmission shift interlocks, do not effectively prevent unauthorized movement of a vehicle's shift mechanism across all potential situations, and reversing these systems poses safety hazards and requires new designs with additional costs.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that detect predefined events to engage a locking device, retaining the shift mechanism in park, reverse, or neutral positions, while maintaining the ignition system off, using existing hardware and software modifications to prevent unauthorized movement without mechanical overrides.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If park-lock systems are used to prevent unauthorized movement when key is not in ignition, then safety is improved for key-out situations, but the system does not address unauthorized movement across all potential situations including when key is in ignition

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidcoverage of safety situations
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The locking device is designed to function across all ignition positions (off, accessory, run, start) rather than being limited to specific positions. The controller activates the locking device based on shift mechanism position and brake pedal status regardless of ignition state, making the safety system universal and applicable to all potential unauthorized movement situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Device complexity

If BTSI systems are activated only when engine is running, then the system is simpler to control, but the system does not prevent unauthorized movement during accessory position or other ignition states

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol logicVSAvoidsafety coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The locking device dynamically adapts its operation based on real-time conditions including ignition position, shift mechanism position, and brake pedal status. The controller continuously monitors these parameters and activates the locking device when appropriate conditions are met, regardless of whether the engine is running, providing flexible and comprehensive safety coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If a mechanical override is added to allow vehicle movement during assembly, then the system becomes more versatile, but the device complexity increases and additional costs are incurred

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle movement capabilityVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the existing brake pedal mechanism and controller logic to provide override functionality during assembly and testing. When the brake pedal is depressed, the controller deactivates the locking device, allowing shift mechanism movement without requiring a separate mechanical override. This leverages existing system components to achieve the needed versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If the locking device is continuously engaged, then unauthorized movement is prevented in all situations, but the system may create safety hazards if power is lost during operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety preventionVSAvoidpotential safety hazards
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The controller continuously monitors system conditions including ignition position, shift mechanism position, and brake pedal status to determine when the locking device should be activated or deactivated. This feedback mechanism ensures the locking device is only engaged when appropriate, preventing unauthorized movement while avoiding hazardous continuous engagement that could occur during power loss or assembly operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8210989B2Method of preventing unauthorized movement of a transmission shift mechanism
Publication Date: 2012.07.03 STEERING SOLUTIONS IP HOLDING CORP
  • US8210989B2 patent drawing
  • US8210989B2 patent drawing
  • US8210989B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of preventing unauthorized movement of a transmission shift mechanism comprises the steps of: detecting a predefined event; moving a locking device into an engaged position with a shift mechanism upon the occurrence of the predefined event to retain the shift mechanism in at least one of a park, reverse, neutral, and drive position; and maintaining an ignition system in a substantially off position during the detecting of the event and the moving of the locking device into the engaged position. A vehicle assembly is also provided comprising the transmission shift mechanism and the locking device coupled to the shift mechanism. The vehicle assembly also includes the ignition system, which is movable between off, accessory, run, and start positions, and a controller with the controller energizing the locking device in response to the predefined event to move the locking device into the locked position while the ignition system remains substantially in the off position.