Transmission Shift Scheduling for Aftertreatment-Aware Emissions Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional powertrain systems fail to dynamically adjust transmission shift schedules to effectively manage aftertreatment system operation, leading to suboptimal emissions compliance and increased energy consumption.

Innovation Solution

A method and system where a controller determines a priority for the vehicle based on data indicative of aftertreatment system operation, and dynamically adjusts transmission shift points considering current gear, accelerator pedal position, acceleration vector, or target gear to optimize aftertreatment system performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional fixed transmission shift schedules are used, then the transmission control is simple and reliable, but aftertreatment system performance is suboptimal and emissions compliance is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemissions complianceVSAvoidtransmission control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic transmission shift schedules that adjust shift points in real-time based on aftertreatment system state and vehicle operating conditions. The controller continuously monitors parameters such as exhaust temperature, aftertreatment component health, and vehicle load to dynamically modify shift schedules, transitioning from fixed to adaptive control to optimize emissions compliance while managing complexity through systematic decision-making algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes key operational parameters including shift points, gear selection timing, and transmission ratio transitions based on aftertreatment system requirements. By adjusting these parameters dynamically according to exhaust temperature, component aging state, and emissions targets, the system achieves improved emissions compliance without requiring complete redesign of the transmission control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If transmission shift schedules are dynamically adjusted to optimize aftertreatment system operation, then emissions compliance improves, but energy consumption increases due to additional control operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemissions complianceVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The controller implements partial dynamic adjustment by applying full dynamic shift schedule modification only when aftertreatment system performance requires it, such as during critical temperature ranges or when component degradation is detected. During normal operating conditions, the system uses standardized shift schedules, thereby reducing unnecessary control operations and associated energy consumption while maintaining emissions compliance during critical periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms where the controller continuously monitors aftertreatment system response to shift operations and adjusts subsequent control actions accordingly. By analyzing the effectiveness of previous dynamic adjustments and current system state, the controller optimizes future control operations to achieve emissions targets with minimal energy expenditure, avoiding excessive or redundant control actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If fixed shift points are used based on current gear and accelerator pedal position, then the control logic is simple, but the system cannot adapt to aftertreatment system state changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to aftertreatment system stateVSAvoidcontrol logic complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system segments the overall control logic into distinct functional modules: aftertreatment state monitoring, priority determination, shift schedule selection, and execution control. Each module handles a specific aspect of the adaptive process, making the overall complex system manageable through modular design. This segmentation allows the system to adapt to aftertreatment state changes while maintaining organized and maintainable control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The controller performs preliminary assessment of aftertreatment system state and determines priority levels before executing shift operations. By pre-evaluating system conditions, component health status, and emissions requirements, the system prepares appropriate shift schedules in advance, reducing the computational burden during real-time operation and enabling adaptability without overwhelming control logic complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12331831B2Dynamic control of transmission shift schedules
Publication Date: 2025.06.17 CUMMINS INC
  • US12331831B2 patent drawing
  • US12331831B2 patent drawing
  • US12331831B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, apparatuses, and systems for determining a dynamic shift schedule for a system are provided. A method includes: determining, by a controller, a priority for a system based on data indicative of operation of the system; determining, by the controller, a shift point for the system based on the priority and at least one of a current gear, a current accelerator pedal position (APP), an acceleration vector, or a target gear; and taking, by the controller, an action based on the determined shift point.