Shift Element Travel Detection for Tooth-On-Tooth Gear Engagement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Form-locking shift elements in transmissions face challenges with accurate determination of actuating-travel range, leading to inefficient gear shifts due to tooth-on-tooth positions and flank clamping, which affect ride comfort and shift times.

Innovation Solution

A method to determine the actuating-travel range between shift-element halves, identifying when a tooth-on-tooth position occurs and adjusting engagement forces to release such positions, ensuring accurate engagement and disengagement of form-locking shift elements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If form-locking shift elements are used to reduce drag torques and improve transmission efficiency, then transmission efficiency is improved, but accurate determination of actuating-travel range becomes difficult leading to shifted or faulty gear changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrag torqueVSAvoidactuating-travel range determination
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

A sensor is introduced as an intermediary component to monitor the actuating movement of the shift-element half. The sensor provides indirect measurement of the actuating-travel range by detecting the position and movement of the shift-element half during engagement and disengagement processes, enabling accurate determination without direct measurement of the travel range itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor signals are fed back to the control device, which uses this feedback information to determine the actuating-travel range and detect tooth-on-tooth positions. The control device adjusts the actuating process based on this feedback, ensuring accurate engagement and disengagement while preventing faulty gear changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If simple software-based evaluation of actuating current is used for friction-locking shift elements, then control complexity is reduced, but form-locking shift elements cannot be properly controlled leading to prolonged engagement times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidgear shift time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces simple software-based current evaluation with a sensor-based detection system that directly monitors the mechanical movement of the shift-element half. This substitution enables precise detection of engagement status and tooth-on-tooth positions, allowing for timely intervention and faster gear shifting despite increased system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor continuously monitors the actuating movement before complete engagement occurs, allowing the control device to detect potential tooth-on-tooth positions in advance and take preliminary corrective actions. This preliminary detection and intervention prevents prolonged engagement times and ensures smooth gear transitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If engagement force is increased to ensure positive engagement of form-locking shift elements, then engagement reliability is improved, but tooth-on-tooth positions occur more frequently causing flank clamping and shifted gear changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengagement reliabilityVSAvoidtooth-on-tooth position
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The control device dynamically adjusts the actuating process based on real-time sensor feedback. Instead of applying constant high engagement force, the system monitors the actuating-travel range and detects tooth-on-tooth positions dynamically, then adjusts the actuating force accordingly to prevent flank clamping and shifted gear changes while maintaining engagement reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor-based detection system provides preliminary warning of approaching tooth-on-tooth positions before they occur. The control device can then apply preliminary counter-actions by reducing or reversing the actuating force to prevent the harmful tooth-on-tooth engagement, thereby avoiding flank clamping and ensuring reliable gear changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS11920675B2Method and control unit for determining the travel range between two gear shift element halves of an interlocking gear shift element
Publication Date: 2024.03.05 ZF FRIEDRICHSHAFEN AG
  • US11920675B2 patent drawing
  • US11920675B2 patent drawing
  • US11920675B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determining an actuating-travel range between two shift-element halves of a form-locking shift element (A, F) during an engagement of the shift element (A, F) and in the presence of a tooth-on-tooth position between the two shift-element halves is provided. An actuating movement of the at least one movable shift-element half with respect to the other shift-element half is monitored by a sensor. A tooth-on-tooth position is detected when it is determined, by the sensor, within an actuating-travel range of the at least one movable shift-element half between a disengaged condition and an engaged condition of the shift element, that the actuating movement of the movable shift-element half in the engagement direction is zero. A ratio between an engagement force applied at the shift element and a radial force acting on the shift-element halves is within a value range, which facilitates a tooth-on-tooth position and an actuating movement of the shift-element half in the engagement direction is detected by the sensor after the reduction of the engagement force and/or after an increase of the applied torque.