Shifter Shaft Retaining Device Segmented Contours

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional locking devices for manual transmissions face challenges in manufacturing due to complex surface structures with small radii and narrow transitions, limiting design flexibility and making it difficult to detect switching positions accurately.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates two radially offset partial switching contours with spring-loaded latching elements, allowing for easier production and improved detectability of switching states, with one contour suitable for neutral and the other for gear engaged positions, enabling superimposed switching force curves for enhanced switching comfort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single M contour with a spring-loaded locking element is used to cover both neutral and engaged gear locking functions, then the locking device structure is simplified, but the surface structure becomes complex with small radii and narrow transitions, limiting design flexibility and manufacturing ease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking device structureVSAvoidsurface structure production
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the single M contour into two separate partial switching contours (first and second), each with its own latching element. This segmentation allows each contour to have simpler, more manufacturable surface structures while collectively achieving the dual locking functions. The first partial switching contour handles neutral position locking and the second handles engaged gear locking, eliminating the need for complex small-radius transitions in a single contour.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If a single M contour is used for both locking functions, then the device structure is simpler, but the switching force gradient is limited and switching comfort is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking device structureVSAvoidswitching comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the locking function into two separate contours with independent latching elements, each contour can be optimized for its specific switching task. This allows for better control over the switching force gradients in each contour, improving overall switching comfort while maintaining structural simplicity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs spring elements connected to each latching element that can be independently adjusted. This dynamic adjustment capability allows optimization of the switching force characteristics for each partial contour, enabling better switching comfort without increasing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If a single M contour is used, then the locking device has fewer components, but switching position detection is difficult due to lack of clear coding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of componentsVSAvoidswitching position detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The division into two separate partial switching contours creates distinct, clearly defined switching positions that are easier to detect. Each contour can be designed with specific geometric features that provide clear coding for position detection, eliminating the ambiguity present in a single complex M contour while not significantly increasing component count.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of manufacture

If two partial switching contours with two latching elements are used, then manufacturing is easier and detectability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface structure productionVSAvoidlocking device structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the two partial switching contours and their latching elements into a single integrated locking device structure. This merging approach distributes the complexity across two simpler, more manufacturable contours while maintaining the overall compactness and functional integration of the locking device, thus not significantly increasing overall device complexity despite the segmentation benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design simplifies manufacturing, enhances detectability of switching states, and achieves more favorable switching force and torque curves, while allowing for a gear-independent reset function, improving overall switching comfort and reliability.

Implementation Method 1

The locking elements are preferably subjected to spring force by a spring element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Data Source

PatentEP2425156B1Retaining device, particularly for a shifter shaft
Publication Date: 2013.08.21 KOKI TECHN TRANSMISSION SYST
  • EP2425156B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2425156B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2425156B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a retaining device, particularly for a shifter shaft (5) of a manual transmission, having a shifting contour (1, 2) and a latching element (3), wherein the shifting contour is associated with a second latching element (4).