Impact Resistant Shingle Transition Zone Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Roofing shingles are vulnerable to damage from hail, ice, and debris due to the stress concentrations at the overlapping edges, leading to costly replacements and inadequate impact resistance.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of a transition zone with a smaller thickness dimension at the edge region of the shingle, coupled with an impact layer and a transition layer, which absorbs and distributes impact forces, reducing stress on overlapping shingles and enhancing impact resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a traditional uniform thickness shingle design is used, then manufacturing is simple and cost-effective, but impact resistance at overlapping edges is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact resistanceVSAvoidshingle structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The shingle incorporates a transition zone at the overlapping edge region with different thickness characteristics compared to the rest of the shingle body. This local modification creates a gradual thickness transition that distributes impact stresses away from sharp edges, improving impact resistance without requiring complete redesign of the entire shingle structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The shingle is divided into distinct functional zones: a headlap portion with reduced thickness and a transition zone with gradual thickness variation. This segmentation allows each zone to perform its specific function - the headlap provides edge protection while the transition zone manages stress distribution - thereby improving overall impact resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If the shingle thickness is increased to improve impact resistance, then durability improves, but material consumption and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact resistanceVSAvoidmaterial consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of uniformly increasing the entire shingle thickness, the invention applies increased thickness only where needed - specifically at the transition zone and headlap portion. This localized thickening provides impact resistance at critical areas while maintaining thinner sections elsewhere, thereby reducing overall material consumption compared to uniform thickening approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The transition zone creates a dynamic thickness profile that gradually varies from the main shingle body to the headlap portion. This gradual transition allows the structure to dynamically distribute impact forces across different thickness zones, providing effective impact resistance without requiring maximum thickness throughout the entire shingle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Strength

If a transition zone with varying thickness is introduced, then impact resistance improves, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact resistanceVSAvoidmanufacturing simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention modifies the thickness parameter of the shingle in a controlled manner within the transition zone. By using gradual thickness variations rather than abrupt changes, the patent creates a manufacturable profile that can be achieved through standard extrusion or forming processes, balancing manufacturing feasibility with improved impact resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces the impact of external forces on shingles, enhancing their durability and resistance to damage, thereby extending their lifespan and reducing replacement costs.

Implementation Method 1

The headlap portion comprises a transition zone disposed at an edge region of the substrate distal to the exposure portion... the shingle has a smaller thickness dimension at the transition zone than a thickness dimension of a remaining area of the shingle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact force absorption: Damping

Data Source

PatentUS9010058B2Shingle with transition device for impact resistance
Publication Date: 2015.04.21 BMIC LLC
  • US9010058B2 patent drawing
  • US9010058B2 patent drawing
  • US9010058B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An impact resistant shingle is provided which includes an asphalt-coated substrate having a first surface and a second surface, the first surface having a headlap portion and an exposure portion. The headlap portion comprises a transition zone disposed at an edge region of the substrate distal to the exposure portion. The first surface of the substrate exclusive of the transition zone comprises granules, wherein the shingle has a smaller thickness dimension at the transition zone than a thickness dimension of a remaining area of the shingle.