Shingled Solar Support Rails for Watertight Panel Runoff

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current solar panel mounting methods on shade structures, which arrange panels in a plane with gaps between them, face challenges in achieving a watertight or near-watertight solution due to water penetration and dirt buildup, and often require complex sealing methods or additional sub-structures, increasing costs and construction time.

Innovation Solution

A modular, reconfigurable solar shingling system using a two-part rail system to create a channel for water runoff between panels, allowing for a shingled arrangement that prevents water and dirt accumulation, with gaskets or sealants at overlaps to ensure a watertight seal and prevent panel rattling during wind.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If panels are arranged in a plane with gaps between them to allow for expansion and contraction, then thermal expansion is accommodated, but water penetration and dirt buildup occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal expansion accommodationVSAvoidwater penetration and dirt buildup
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a two-dimensional planar arrangement to a three-dimensional stepped configuration where panels are offset vertically. This dimensional change allows panels to expand and contract along the vertical axis while maintaining water runoff capability, as water flows down the stepped surfaces without penetrating between panels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The array is divided into multiple stepped levels or tiers, creating segmented horizontal surfaces at different elevations. This segmentation provides multiple drainage paths for water and prevents dirt accumulation by ensuring water flows downward rather than pooling between panels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Object-affected harmful factors

If sealing methods such as gaskets or sealants are used between panels, then water leakage is reduced, but dirt buildup along panel edges increases and sealing effectiveness degrades over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater leakage preventionVSAvoiddirt buildup along panel edges
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

By arranging panels in a stepped three-dimensional configuration rather than a flat plane, the patent eliminates horizontal gaps where water would pool and carry dirt along panel edges. Water naturally flows downward along the vertical faces of the stepped structure, preventing both leakage and dirt accumulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If a sub-roof is installed underneath the entire array of panels, then water leakage is prevented, but cost and construction time increase and heat buildup occurs underneath panels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater leakage preventionVSAvoidincreased cost and construction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the need for a separate sub-roof structure by integrating water runoff functionality directly into the panel mounting structure itself. The stepped configuration of the mounting rails and panels creates inherent drainage paths, eliminating the need for additional waterproofing layers and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Ease of manufacture

If panels are arranged in a plane with adjacent edges in a butt condition, then installation is straightforward, but sealing all four edges of each panel becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation simplicityVSAvoidsealing difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a stepped three-dimensional arrangement where panels are offset vertically rather than butted together in a plane. This creates overlapping vertical faces that are naturally easier to seal, as water flows downward along these faces rather than attempting to penetrate horizontal gaps between butted panels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS11894797B1Solar support structures and methods
Publication Date: 2024.02.06 POWERSHINGLE LLC
  • US11894797B1 patent drawing
  • US11894797B1 patent drawing
  • US11894797B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method of providing a solar support structures for columns of shingled photovoltaic solar panel assemblies.