Shipping Container with Expanding Bag for Hazardous Materials

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing shipping containers for hazardous materials face issues with durability, size, weight, and cost, particularly in meeting regulatory requirements for leak-proof and pressure-resistant transportation of biological specimens, with previous solutions being either expensive or lacking structural integrity.

Innovation Solution

A shipping container composed of a substantially rigid exterior enclosure made from corrugated cardboard and expanded polystyrene foam, combined with a flexible, gas-impermeable interior bag that is manually evacuated and sealed, providing a cost-effective and compliant solution for transporting biologically hazardous materials.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If rigid containers are used to protect contents during handling and transport, then durability and protection are improved, but weight and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The container is divided into two distinct parts: a rigid outer shell for structural protection and a flexible inner bag for containing the hazardous material. This segmentation allows each component to fulfill its specific function optimally - the rigid shell provides durability during handling while the flexible bag minimizes weight and adapts to the actual volume of contents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the container system have different mechanical properties tailored to their specific functions. The outer shell is made rigid to withstand impacts and handling stresses, while the inner bag is made flexible to reduce weight and conform to the actual volume of materials being transported, rather than requiring the entire container to be rigid.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If rigid containers are used to protect contents during handling and transport, then durability and protection are improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The container is divided into two distinct parts: a rigid outer shell for structural protection and a flexible inner bag for containing the hazardous material. This segmentation allows each component to fulfill its specific function optimally - the rigid shell provides durability during handling while the flexible bag minimizes weight and adapts to the actual volume of contents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the container system have different mechanical properties tailored to their specific functions. The outer shell is made rigid to withstand impacts and handling stresses, while the inner bag is made flexible to reduce weight and conform to the actual volume of materials being transported, rather than requiring the entire container to be rigid.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If container size is increased to meet regulatory volume requirements, then compliance is improved, but transportation cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecomplianceVSAvoidtransportation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The inner bag is designed to be expandable and collapsible, allowing it to dynamically adjust its volume based on the actual amount of hazardous material being transported. When fully inflated, it meets the minimum volume requirements for compliance; when collapsed, it minimizes the occupied space and reduces transportation costs for empty or partially filled containers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The volume parameter of the inner bag can be changed on demand by inflating or deflating it. This allows the container to meet regulatory volume requirements when needed while minimizing transportation costs by reducing volume when the bag is empty or partially filled, effectively decoupling the volume requirement from the actual cargo volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Weight of moving object

If flexible sidewalls are used to reduce weight and cost, then weight and cost are reduced, but structural integrity and protection deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveweightVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The container is divided into two distinct parts: a rigid outer shell for structural protection and a flexible inner bag for containing the hazardous material. This segmentation allows each component to fulfill its specific function optimally - the rigid shell provides durability during handling while the flexible bag minimizes weight and adapts to the actual volume of contents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the container system have different mechanical properties tailored to their specific functions. The outer shell is made rigid to withstand impacts and handling stresses, while the inner bag is made flexible to reduce weight and conform to the actual volume of materials being transported, rather than requiring the entire container to be rigid.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution meets federal regulations for pressure resistance and reduces manufacturing and transportation costs while ensuring the safety and integrity of biological specimens during air transport, offering a durable and cost-effective shipping solution.

Implementation Method 1

the shipping container will undergo a second atmospheric pressure, such as where an aircraft transports the shipping container within a non-pressurized cargo hold

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure reduction: Pressure Drop

Implementation Method 2

the bag is sized so that, if filled with air or other contents, it will engage all of the walls of the exterior enclosure if placed within its interior cavity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectManual evacuation: Vacuum

Data Source

PatentUS7389627B2Method of shipping container with expanding bag
Publication Date: 2008.06.24 THERAPAK LLC
  • US7389627B2 patent drawing
  • US7389627B2 patent drawing
  • US7389627B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A shipping container is provided for transporting biologically hazardous materials. The shipping container includes a rigid gas permeable exterior enclosure and an interior positioned substantially gas impermeable flexible bag. Preferably, the exterior enclosure includes an outer cardboard box and inner foam box made of expanded polystyrene. Preferably, the inner bag is made of polyethylene and includes a conventional open top. Preferably, the bag also includes two laterally extending lines. A first line provides a visual indication to the user where air should be evacuated from the bag. A second line is provided to indicate where the bag should be sealed.