Multi-Carrier Shipping Platform Predictive Transit Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In the shipping logistics field, shippers face challenges in selecting cost-effective carrier services that meet their time-in-transit requirements, as services with guaranteed delivery times are often more expensive, while those without guarantees may still satisfy delivery needs, but at higher costs.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize historical shipment data to forecast time-in-transit for specific shipping lanes, allowing for the selection of lower-priced carrier services that can meet target delivery times, even without published guarantees, by generating statistically significant time-in-transit data and using predictive models incorporating additional data sources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If services with guaranteed delivery times are selected, then delivery time reliability is improved, but shipping cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery time guaranteeVSAvoidshipping cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of historical shipment data and carrier performance metrics before making shipping service selections. By pre-processing and storing carrier reliability data, transit time statistics, and service performance patterns, the system can evaluate multiple carrier options and predict delivery outcomes in advance, enabling cost-effective selections that meet delivery requirements without relying solely on expensive guaranteed services

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts selection criteria by changing parameters such as carrier reliability thresholds, expected transit time ranges, and service level requirements. Instead of rigidly requiring guaranteed delivery times, the system uses flexible parameter ranges and probabilistic assessments to identify carriers that can meet delivery targets at lower costs, transforming the approach from deterministic guarantee-based selection to parameter-driven optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If lower-priced carrier services without delivery time guarantees are selected, then shipping cost decreases, but delivery time reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshipping costVSAvoiddelivery time guarantee
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback loops that continuously monitor actual delivery performance against predictions and update carrier reliability models. By analyzing historical data from completed shipments, the system refines its understanding of carrier performance patterns, enabling more accurate predictions about which lower-cost carriers will reliably meet specific delivery targets, thus reducing the risk of selecting unreliable services

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system treats shipping service selections as context-specific, temporary decisions rather than relying on permanent guarantees. By evaluating carrier performance for each specific shipping route, package characteristics, and delivery requirement combination, the system can confidently select lower-cost services that are adequate for particular situations without needing expensive universal guarantees, effectively using the right service for each specific case

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Quantity of substance

If multiple carrier services are evaluated with historical data analysis, then shipping option quality improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshipping option qualityVSAvoiddata processing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex evaluation process into distinct modular components: data collection modules that gather carrier and shipment information, data processing modules that analyze historical patterns, evaluation modules that assess carrier performance against criteria, and selection modules that recommend optimal services. This segmentation allows each component to handle specific tasks independently, making the overall complex system manageable and maintainable while still providing comprehensive multi-carrier evaluation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary data structures and processing layers that mediate between raw carrier data and final selection decisions. These intermediaries include standardized data formats, aggregation routines that summarize carrier performance, and caching mechanisms that store pre-processed information. These intermediaries simplify the interface between complex data sources and decision-making processes, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining evaluation quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11694152B2System and method for processing shipment requests using a multi-service shipping platform
Publication Date: 2023.07.04 SIMPLER POSTAGE INC
  • US11694152B2 patent drawing
  • US11694152B2 patent drawing
  • US11694152B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for processing shipment request by using a multi-carrier shipping services platform.