Shock Absorber Flange With Metallic Cage And Plastic Ducts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing shock absorbers face challenges in achieving a mechanically strong and lightweight connection between the module tube and the shock absorber tube, while also ensuring a pressure-tight fluid connection, particularly when the distance between the tubes needs to be increased, and in maintaining sealing without adding weight or compromising mechanical strength.

Innovation Solution

A flange design featuring a metallic support cage for mechanical retention and a plastics body with fluid ducts for fluidic coupling, where the metallic support cage is produced from sheet-metal components and encapsulated within the plastics body, allowing for increased mechanical durability and reduced weight, with optional sealing elements and metallic tube elements for enhanced pressure resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a metallic flange is used to connect the module tube to the shock absorber tube, then the mechanical strength is improved, but the weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strength of connectionVSAvoidweight of shock absorber
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The flange is divided into two functional parts: a metallic support cage for mechanical retention and a plastics body for fluid duct formation. This segmentation allows each material to be used where it provides the most benefit, reducing overall weight while maintaining strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The flange combines metallic and plastics materials in a composite structure. The metallic support cage provides mechanical strength while the plastics body provides fluid sealing and duct formation, creating a lightweight yet strong connection component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Length of moving object

If the distance between the module tube and shock absorber tube is increased, then structural requirements are met, but the mechanical load-bearing capacity of the flange connection decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistance between tubesVSAvoidmechanical load-bearing capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The support cage is designed with a dynamic geometry that optimizes load distribution. The cage structure can adapt to different distances between tubes while maintaining load-bearing capacity through its geometric configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The support cage extends in multiple dimensions to provide structural support over increased distances. By adding spatial complexity in the form of a three-dimensional cage structure, the flange maintains mechanical strength even when the distance between tubes is increased.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Strength

If a metallic solid material flange is used, then mechanical strength is improved, but sealing of fluid ducts becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strength of flangeVSAvoidease of sealing fluid ducts
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The plastics body is integrated with the metallic support cage to form a composite flange. The plastics material provides inherent sealing properties for the fluid ducts while the metallic cage provides structural strength, combining the advantages of both materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the flange have different material properties optimized for their specific functions: the metallic support cage provides local strength where mechanical loads are applied, while the plastics body provides local sealing quality where fluid ducts are formed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Quantity of substance

If transfer rings are used to form the flange, then fluidic connection is achieved, but the maximum distance between tubes is structurally limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid connection capabilityVSAvoidmaximum distance between tubes
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The flange is segmented into a support cage structure that can span greater distances compared to solid transfer rings. The cage structure divides the space between tubes into multiple compartments, allowing for extended distance while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10344819B2Damper for a vehicle having a flange for connecting an external module tube
Publication Date: 2019.07.09 THYSSENKRUPP BILSTEIN GMBH
  • US10344819B2 patent drawing
  • US10344819B2 patent drawing
  • US10344819B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A shock absorber having a shock absorber tube (10) is disclosed and has an external module tube (11) which is connected to the shock absorber tube (10) via a flange (12), wherein the flange (12) has one or more fluid ducts (13, 14) which fluidly couple the module tube (11) to the shock absorber tube (10). The flange (12) has at least one metallic support cage (15) which forms a retentive connection between the shock absorber tube (10) and the module tube (11), and the flange (12) has a plastics body (16) in which the fluid duct (13, 14) for the fluidic coupling of the module tube (11) to the shock absorber tube (10) is formed.