Hydraulic Shock Absorber Flow Ducts for Uniform Pressurization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing shock absorbers with positive pressure build-up and solid main pistons face challenges in maintaining uniform pressurization without turbulent flow, valve resonance, or oil fluctuations, especially when valve diameters are smaller than the main piston, leading to restricted flow and complex adjustments.

Innovation Solution

A hydraulic shock absorber design featuring a solid main piston with an external pressurization reservoir and adjustable valves, where flow ducts are sized to prevent turbulent flow and valve resonance, with the same pressure acting on both valves to ensure balanced damping characteristics, and a common chamber connected to the pressurization reservoir to maintain positive pressure in damping chambers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If valve diameters are made smaller than the main piston diameter, then the shock absorber can achieve compact dimensions, but turbulent flow and valve resonance occur leading to non-uniform pressurization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock absorber sizeVSAvoidpressurization uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

A common chamber is introduced as an intermediary component between the pressurization reservoir and the two damping chambers. This common chamber receives pressurized damping medium from the reservoir and distributes it uniformly to both damping chambers through separate flow ducts, ensuring equal pressurization without turbulent flow or valve resonance even when using compact valve diameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Volume of moving object

If flow ducts are restricted to accommodate compact design, then device size is reduced, but flow capacity becomes insufficient for large pressure differentials

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock absorber sizeVSAvoiddamping medium flow capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The flow path is segmented into multiple independent flow ducts: a first flow duct connects the compression chamber to the common chamber, and a second flow duct connects the rebound chamber to the common chamber. Each duct is optimized for its specific function, allowing the system to handle large pressure differentials effectively while maintaining compact overall dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If two separate adjusting elements are used to control flow in each damping chamber, then damping characteristics can be adjusted, but pressure balance control becomes difficult and device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamping adjustment capabilityVSAvoidpressure balance control
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The common chamber creates a hydraulic equipotential connection between the two damping chambers. By receiving pressurized medium from the reservoir and distributing it equally to both chambers through the flow ducts, the common chamber ensures that both damping chambers operate at the same pressure potential, simplifying pressure balance control while maintaining independent damping adjustment capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design achieves uniform pressurization and damping force generation without turbulent flow, reduces valve resonance, and allows for compact dimensions by ensuring laminar flow and balanced pressure across both valves, simplifying adjustments and maintaining effective damping performance.

Implementation Method 1

a gas pressurized member, arranged in a pressurization reservoir, pressurizes a damping medium-filled chamber common to both damping chambers to a predetermined pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressurization: Pressurisation

Implementation Method 2

The two damping chambers can be connected to the common chamber by means of a first flow duct between the compression chamber and the common chamber and a second flow duct between the rebound chamber and the common chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic flow: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 3

Said adjusting elements comprise one or more damping force-generating, one-way valves(s) and a check valve

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscous damping: Viscous Damping

Data Source

PatentUS9091319B2Shock absorber with hydraulic flow ducts
Publication Date: 2015.07.28 OHLINS RACING AB
  • US9091319B2 patent drawing
  • US9091319B2 patent drawing
  • US9091319B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a hydraulic shock absorber. A solid main piston is designed to slide in a damping cylinder parallel to the movement generated when the shock absorber is subjected to a compression or a rebound stroke, the main piston dividing the damping cylinder into a first damping chamber containing the piston rod and a second damping chamber which does not contain the piston rod. A pressurization reservoir is pressurized by a force acting on a moving piston. The pressurization reservoir is arranged outside the damping cylinder and oriented at an angle relative to the damping cylinder. Two separate, adjustable valves generate a damping force acting in opposition to the stroke movement by restricting a damping medium flow between the damping chambers. A fourth defined chamber is hydraulically connected via separate flow paths to both the first and the second damping chamber and the pressurization reservoir.