Shock Absorber Spring Layout With Adjustable Stopper Breakpoints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing spring systems in vehicle shock absorbers with multiple springs for variable spring rates are complex and difficult to adjust for changing driving conditions, requiring precise adjustments that are not easily adaptable.

Innovation Solution

A spring system comprising a first and second platform, coupled springs, and adjustable stoppers that limit compression and expansion, allowing simultaneous adjustment of breaking points to achieve a variable spring rate, enhancing adaptability to driving conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple springs are used to provide variable spring rate, then ride quality is improved, but device complexity increases and adjustment becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveride qualityVSAvoidspring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The stopper is made adjustable along the axis to dynamically change the compression limit position. This allows the spring system to adapt its characteristics based on driving conditions, providing variable spring rate without requiring multiple fixed springs. The adjustable stopper enables the system to transition between different spring rate regimes by changing where the stopper engages during compression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the effective spring rate by modifying the compression distance available to the spring. By adjusting the stopper position, the maximum compression length of the spring varies, which changes the spring rate characteristics. This parameter change approach allows a single spring to provide multiple spring rate regimes rather than requiring multiple springs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stability of the object's composition

If multiple springs are used to increase spring stiffness at outer ends, then chassis stability is improved, but the number of components increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechassis stabilityVSAvoidnumber of spring components
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The adjustable stopper creates a dynamic system where the spring can operate in different compression ranges. By moving the stopper to different positions, the system can provide increased stiffness at outer ends when needed while using a single spring component. The stopper engagement point determines when the spring transitions from soft to stiff behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The compression stroke is segmented into different zones by the stopper position. The first zone (from free length to stopper engagement) provides softer spring rate, while the second zone (beyond stopper engagement) provides increased stiffness. This segmentation of the compression range allows a single spring to deliver multiple stiffness characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of manufacture

If spring system is designed with fixed breaking points, then manufacturing is simplified, but adaptability to changing driving conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespring system manufacturingVSAvoidadaptability to driving conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The stopper is designed with adjustable positioning capability along the axis, allowing the breaking point to be dynamically changed. This can be achieved through threaded adjustment, telescopic mechanisms, or other means that allow the stopper to be repositioned. The adjustable stopper enables the same spring system to be adapted to different driving conditions such as load changes, road quality, or speed variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Device complexity

If stopper position is fixed, then device complexity is reduced, but ability to adjust ride height and breaking points simultaneously is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustment mechanism complexityVSAvoidsimultaneous adjustment capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The adjustment mechanism combines multiple functions into a single action. By adjusting the stopper position along the axis, the system simultaneously changes both the ride height (through platform position) and the breaking points (through stopper engagement position). This merging of adjustment functions reduces the number of separate adjustment mechanisms needed while maintaining full adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides a variable spring rate that improves ride comfort and stability by adjusting to changing conditions, reducing chassis movements, and allowing faster adaptation to load changes without altering the spring preload.

Implementation Method 1

a first spring (130) arranged in abutment with the first platform (110), and a second spring (140) which is coupled in series with the first spring (130) and arranged in abutment with the second platform (120)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

The first stopper (150) is arranged to limit the compression of the first spring (130) when the first spring (130) has a first predetermined length (L1)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 3

the second stopper (160) is arranged to limit the expansion of the first spring (130) when the first spring (130) has a second predetermined length (L2)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentEP4707634A1Spring system for a vehicle shock absorber, shock absorber comprising the same and method for regulating a spring system of a shock absorber
Publication Date: 2026.03.11 OHLINS RACING AB
  • EP4707634A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4707634A1 patent drawingFigure 2a
  • EP4707634A1 patent drawingFigure 2b

AI summary

There is provided a spring system (300) for a vehicle shock absorber. The spring system (300) comprising a first platform (310), a second platform (320) which is movable relative to the first platform (310), a first spring (330) arranged in abutment with the first platform (310), a second spring (340), coupled in series with the first spring (330) and arranged in abutment with the second platform (320). The spring system further provides a first stopper (350), and a second stopper (260). The first stopper (350) is arranged to limit the compression of the first spring (330) when the first spring has a first predetermined length (L1), and the second stopper (360) is arranged to limit the expansion of the first spring (330) when the first spring (330) has a second predetermined length (L2). The first platform (310) is adjustable along an axis (A) extending between the first platform (310) and the second platform (320) such to adjust the first predetermined length (L1) and the second predetermined length (L2).