Integrated Shock Absorber Valve Core for Adjustable Damping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing shock absorbers for automobiles have issues with low integration, numerous parts, and high machining costs, leading to difficulty in assembly and a large volume, while also failing to adapt effectively to varying road conditions.

Innovation Solution

A shock absorber design incorporating a cylinder, piston, flow regulating valve, and pilot valve, with integrated air channels and one-way valves, allowing for adjustable damping and improved space utilization, assembly, and reduced parts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the shock absorber uses traditional design with separate components for damping adjustment, then the damping can be adjusted for different road conditions, but the shock absorber has many parts, low integration, and large volume

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamping adjustment capabilityVSAvoidnumber of parts
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates the damping adjustment mechanism into the existing shock absorber structure by combining the flow regulating valve and pilot valve into a unified valve assembly. The air channel is integrated within the valve core, eliminating the need for separate adjustment mechanisms and reducing the total number of parts while maintaining adaptability for different road conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The valve core serves multiple functions: it acts as both the flow regulating valve body and contains the integrated air channel for damping adjustment. This multi-functional design allows the same component to provide both fluid flow regulation and adjustable damping control, reducing the number of separate parts needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Manufacturing precision

If the shock absorber uses traditional design with separate components, then each component can be optimized independently, but the assembly process becomes difficult and machining costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent optimizationVSAvoidassembly difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By merging the air channel into the valve core structure, the patent reduces the number of assembly steps. The integrated design eliminates the need to assemble separate air channel components with the valve body, simplifying the assembly process while maintaining the ability to optimize the valve core design for manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of manufacture

If the shock absorber uses traditional design with multiple separate components, then each component can be manufactured independently, but the shock absorber has low space utilization rate and large volume

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindependent manufacturingVSAvoidshock absorber volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The air channel is nested within the valve core structure, utilizing the internal space of the valve core for the air passage. This nested design allows the air channel to occupy space that would otherwise be empty or unused in the valve assembly, improving space utilization and reducing the overall volume of the shock absorber.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design achieves high integration, easy assembly, and low machining costs, while providing adaptable damping for varying road conditions, enhancing vehicle stability and reducing vibration.

Implementation Method 1

When the valve core moves, the flow regulating valve is controlled by the pilot valve, so as to regulate a flow rate of a fluid between the compression chamber and the rebound chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow regulation:

Implementation Method 2

The first one-way valve is arranged in the first air channel, configuring gas to flow only from the first air channel towards the flow regulating valve. The second one-way valve is arranged in the second air channel, configuring the gas to flow from the second air channel away from the flow regulating valve

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOne-way flow control:

Implementation Method 3

a first spring and a second spring, respectively, to push the valve core

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic force: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS20250320905A1Shock absorber and vehicle having same
Publication Date: 2025.10.16 BYD CO LTD
  • US20250320905A1 patent drawing
  • US20250320905A1 patent drawing
  • US20250320905A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A shock absorber includes: a cylinder; a piston disposed in the cylinder and dividing the cylinder into a compression chamber and a rebound chamber; a flow regulating valve disposed in the piston, and in communication with the compression chamber and the rebound chamber; a valve core disposed in the piston; a pilot valve connected to the valve core and controlling the flow regulating valve to regulate a flow rate of a fluid between the compression chamber and the rebound chamber; a first air channel configured in the valve core and the pilot valve, and connected with spaces on two ends of the moving direction of the valve core and the rebound chamber; and a second air channel configured in the valve core and connected with the spaces on the two ends of the moving direction of the valve core.