Electromagnetic Shock Generator Synchronization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pyrotechnic shock generators used in satellite equipment qualification tests face challenges such as powerful and difficult-to-adjust shocks, manual implementation inaccuracies, lack of synchronization, and pollution issues, which are not compatible with sensitive equipment or clean room requirements.

Innovation Solution

A method for synchronizing or dephasing at least two cartridge shock generators using electromagnetic actuators powered by a power and control box, which detects the moment of percussion and adjusts the operation timing through electronic delays, allowing for adjustable shock amplitude and frequency, and ensuring cleanliness by being airtight.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If pyrotechnic shock generators with powder or detonators are used, then shock generation capability is achieved, but pyrotechnic certification and safety regulations are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock generation capabilityVSAvoidpyrotechnic certification requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces pyrotechnic mechanisms (powder ignition, detonators) with an electromagnetic actuator system. The electromagnetic actuator uses electrical energy to generate mechanical motion that drives the impactor, eliminating the need for pyrotechnic materials and associated safety certifications while maintaining shock generation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the energy source parameter from chemical (pyrotechnic) to electrical (electromagnetic). This parameter change allows for precise control of shock amplitude and frequency through electrical parameters, eliminating pyrotechnic risks while maintaining effective shock generation for qualification testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If multiple shock generators are used to simulate complex shock environments, then test accuracy is improved, but synchronization between generators becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock test accuracyVSAvoidsynchronization difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple shock generators into a synchronized system controlled by a single electronic control unit. The control unit receives a trigger signal and simultaneously activates multiple electromagnetic actuators, ensuring precise temporal synchronization. This allows multiple generators to work together as a coordinated system for accurate complex shock environment simulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the electronic control unit monitors and adjusts the activation timing of multiple shock generators based on a common trigger signal. This feedback control ensures that all generators synchronize their operation, enabling accurate reproduction of complex shock sequences with precise timing relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If pyrotechnic generators are operated manually, then operation flexibility is maintained, but positioning accuracy and repeatability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual operation flexibilityVSAvoidpositioning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service through automated electronic control of the electromagnetic actuators. The system automatically positions and activates the impactors based on electronic signals, eliminating manual positioning errors. The electronic control system ensures repeatable positioning accuracy while maintaining operational flexibility through programmable control sequences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical operation with an electromagnetic actuation system controlled by electronic signals. This substitution provides precise, repeatable positioning of the impactor while maintaining operational flexibility through electronic control, eliminating the inconsistency inherent in manual positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Power

If detonator or powder-based generators are used, then shock amplitude can be generated, but adjustment of amplitude and frequency becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock amplitudeVSAvoidamplitude and frequency adjustment
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic control of shock parameters through the electromagnetic actuator system. The electronic control unit can dynamically adjust the amplitude, frequency, and timing of shock generation by varying electrical parameters (voltage, current, pulse duration). This dynamic control enables flexible adaptation to different test requirements without changing physical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the control parameter from fixed pyrotechnic charge mass to variable electrical parameters. By adjusting voltage, current, and pulse duration of the electromagnetic actuator, the system can precisely control shock amplitude and frequency, providing continuous adaptability across a range of test conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

5Reliability

If shock generators are used in clean room environments, then equipment qualification is achieved, but particulate pollution from generators becomes problematic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment qualification accuracyVSAvoidparticulate pollution
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces pyrotechnic mechanisms that generate particulate pollution with an electromagnetic actuator system. The electromagnetic system generates shock through electromagnetic force without combustion or mechanical breakdown, eliminating the generation of particulates. This allows qualification testing to be performed in clean room environments without compromising air quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a clean operating environment by using an electromagnetic actuator that does not generate particulate contamination. The system operates in a manner consistent with clean room requirements, maintaining the inert and contamination-free atmosphere necessary for sensitive equipment qualification testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method optimizes shock generation on equipment, eliminates pyrotechnic risks, and ensures synchronization or phase shifting of multiple generators, providing adjustable and synchronized shocks without pollution, suitable for clean room environments.

Implementation Method 1

actuated by means of an electromagnetic actuator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic actuation: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentEP3839471B1Method for synchronising or phase shift of impact generators
Publication Date: 2023.06.07 CENT NAT DETUD SPATIALES (CNES)
  • EP3839471B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3839471B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3839471B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method for synchronizing or phasing at least two cartridge shock generators (1), said at least two shock generators (1) being actuated by means of an electromagnetic actuator powered by a power and control unit, in which the method comprises the steps of: - Starting up at least two shock generators (1) each comprising an inert cartridge, - Detecting a percussion instant of the cartridges of each shock generator, - Synchronizing or phasing said at least two shock generators (1).