Single-Stage Shock Strut Servicing Without Repeated Gas Cycling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing servicing procedures for single-stage mixed fluid/gas shock struts in landing gear are time-consuming and costly due to the need for frequent gas and oil leakage compensation, requiring cumbersome cycling to remove trapped gas, which affects the performance and functionality of the shock strut.

Innovation Solution

A method involving deflation, compression, and charging of the shock strut with liquid and gas, utilizing valves and external weights or jacks to manage pressure and volume, specifically tailored to weight-on-wheel and weight-off-wheel scenarios, to efficiently reduce residual air and maintain optimal pressure and extension.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the aircraft is lifted above the ground to cycle the shock strut multiple times to remove trapped gas, then the trapped gas is removed from the shock strut, but the servicing time and complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremoval of trapped gasVSAvoidservicing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the trapped gas removal process from the complex multi-cycle strut cycling procedure and implements it through a direct liquid charging method that forces liquid through the system to purge trapped gas in a single operation, eliminating the need for repeated lifting and cycling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces liquid hydraulic fluid as an intermediary medium to achieve gas removal. By charging the shock strut with liquid under pressure, the liquid acts as a carrier that forces trapped gas through the system and out of the strut, simplifying the gas removal process without requiring mechanical cycling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the shock strut is cycled multiple times to remove trapped gas, then the trapped gas is expelled, but the servicing procedure becomes cumbersome and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremoval of trapped gasVSAvoidservicing procedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the gas removal function from the complex cycling procedure and implements it through direct liquid charging, where liquid is pumped into the shock strut to force trapped gas through the system and out of discharge ports in a single straightforward operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical state and pressure parameters of the hydraulic fluid to achieve gas removal. By controlling liquid pressure and flow rate during charging, the system forces trapped gas through the piston and out of the strut without requiring mechanical cycling, simplifying the servicing procedure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If liquid is pumped into the shock strut to force trapped gas through the system, then trapped gas is removed efficiently, but the pressure and volume control must be precisely managed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas removal efficiencyVSAvoidpressure and volume control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms through pressure sensors and flow meters that monitor the liquid charging process in real-time. This allows the system to automatically adjust pumping rate and pressure to maintain optimal conditions for gas removal while preventing over-pressurization or improper fluid levels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes controlled changes in liquid pressure, temperature, and flow rate to efficiently remove trapped gas. By precisely managing these parameters during the charging process, the system achieves effective gas purging while maintaining safe and optimal operating conditions within the shock strut

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method significantly reduces the time and cost associated with servicing by effectively managing residual air and pressure within the shock strut, enhancing its performance and serviceability while maintaining optimal operational conditions.

Implementation Method 1

charging the shock strut with a liquid until a pressure of the liquid decreases a volume of a residual air located inside of the shock strut

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 2

charging the shock strut with a gas until the gas comprises a pre-determined pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure Increase: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS11248678B2Servicing procedure for single-stage mixed fluid/gas shock strut
Publication Date: 2022.02.15 GOODRICH CORP
  • US11248678B2 patent drawing
  • US11248678B2 patent drawing
  • US11248678B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for weight off wheel shock strut servicing includes deflating the shock strut, compressing the shock strut via a jack until the shock strut is in a compressed position, charging the shock strut with an oil until a pressure of the oil reduces a volume of a residual air located inside of the shock strut, lowering the jack until a shock strut piston reaches a pre-determined extension, and charging the shock strut with a gas until the gas comprises a pre-determined pressure.