Multi-Directional Shock Testing Apparatus with Rotating Drop Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional shock-resistance testing apparatuses are limited to testing impact in one direction, failing to simulate the varied impact directions that electronic devices may experience when falling, which does not adequately assess their overall shock resistance.

Innovation Solution

A shock-resistance testing apparatus featuring a support base with rotating components and a controller that allows the testing board to rotate and lift, enabling the electronic device to be dropped from different angles, simulating multiple impact directions through motor-driven mechanisms and baffle parts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a traditional shock-resistance testing apparatus tests only one direction, then the device structure remains simple, but it cannot adequately assess the electronic device's overall shock resistance against multi-directional impacts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting direction coverageVSAvoidapparatus structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The testing apparatus employs dynamic rotating components including a rotating component that can rotate the testing board to different angles, and a lifting component that can rotate to change the dropping direction. This dynamic capability allows the same apparatus to test multiple directions without requiring multiple fixed testing positions, thereby improving adaptability while controlling structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The lifting component serves multiple functions: it can lift the testing board vertically, rotate to change dropping directions, and work in combination with the rotating component to achieve comprehensive multi-directional testing. This multi-functionality allows a single component to replace what would otherwise require multiple separate testing apparatuses

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If the testing apparatus adds rotating and lifting components to enable multi-directional testing, then the testing comprehensiveness improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock resistance assessment accuracyVSAvoidrotating and lifting mechanisms
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The rotating component and lifting component are integrated into a coordinated system where the rotating component rotates the testing board to predetermined angles and the lifting component rotates and lifts to create multi-directional dropping paths. This merging of functions into a coordinated mechanism achieves comprehensive testing while avoiding the need for entirely separate testing systems for each direction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The rotating component rotates the testing board to predetermined angles before the dropping test, and the lifting component positions the testing board at required heights and orientations in advance. This preliminary positioning ensures that the electronic device receives impacts from specific directions (front, rear, left, right, top, bottom edges) with controlled precision, improving assessment reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10436671B2Shock-resistance testing apparatus
Publication Date: 2019.10.08 FU TAI HUA IND SHENZHEN
  • US10436671B2 patent drawing
  • US10436671B2 patent drawing
  • US10436671B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A shock-resistance testing apparatus includes a support base, a first rotating component and a controller provided on the support base. A second rotating component is coupled to one side of the first rotating component. A testing board is placed on the first rotating component. A falling board is placed on the testing board. The controller controls the first rotating component to drive the second rotating component rotating from one side of the testing board to another side of the testing board. The controller controls the second rotating component to lift the testing board. The controller controls the second rotating component to move away from the testing board so that the testing board falls.