Shoe Holder With Parallel Adjustable Surfaces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing shoe holders fail to provide a secure hold for shoes with high shaft heights and large sizes, as they require sharp angling, which compromises stability, especially for EU size 43 and larger.

Innovation Solution

A shoe holder with parallel shoe-receiving surfaces and adjustable vertical and horizontal mechanisms, allowing for variable distance and length adjustments to accommodate different shoe sizes and shapes, ensuring a stable hold without angling, using detachable plug-in, latching, or sliding connections.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the head is angled sharply to position shoes with high shafts on the base, then shoes with high shafts can be accommodated, but the secure hold of the shoe on the head cannot be guaranteed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodation of shoes with high shaftsVSAvoidsecure hold of shoe on head
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The shoe holder employs adjustable components that allow dynamic reconfiguration of the holding surfaces. The vertical adjustment mechanism enables the second holding element to be positioned at different heights relative to the first holding element, while the horizontal adjustment mechanism allows lateral positioning. This dynamic adjustability ensures that shoes with varying shaft heights can be accommodated while maintaining stable, non-angled parallel surfaces that provide secure holding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If the head is angled sharply to accommodate shoes, then high shaft shoes can be positioned, but stability is compromised especially for EU size 43 and larger

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning of high shaft shoesVSAvoidstability of shoe hold
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The adjustable mechanisms enable the holding surfaces to be dynamically configured for different shoe sizes and shaft heights while maintaining stable parallel alignment, eliminating the need for sharp angling that compromises stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the geometric parameters of the holder configuration by allowing vertical and horizontal adjustment of the second holding element relative to the first. This enables the distance and relative positioning to be optimized for each shoe while maintaining the stabilizing parallel surface arrangement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If parallel surfaces are used to ensure stable hold, then stability is improved, but the ability to accommodate different shaft heights is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestable hold on shoesVSAvoidaccommodation of different shaft heights
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The parallel holding surfaces are made dynamically adjustable through the vertical and horizontal adjustment mechanisms. This allows the distance and relative positioning between the first and second holding elements to be changed while maintaining parallel alignment, thus accommodating various shaft heights without sacrificing stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The shoe holder is designed as a universal device that can accommodate multiple types of shoes with different characteristics. The adjustable parallel holding surfaces provide multi-functionality, enabling the same device to securely hold shoes ranging from low-cut to high-boot styles while maintaining stable parallel contact surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Device complexity

If fixed distance between holding surfaces is used, then structural simplicity is maintained, but accommodation of different shoe sizes is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural simplicityVSAvoidaccommodation of different shoe sizes
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The shoe holder transitions from a fixed structure to a dynamically adjustable one. The vertical adjustment mechanism allows changing the distance between the first and second holding elements in the vertical direction, while the horizontal adjustment mechanism enables lateral distance adjustment. This dynamic capability provides adaptability for different shoe sizes while adding only moderate structural complexity through standardized adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3981290A1Holder for a pair of shoes
Publication Date: 2022.04.13 MULLER ALEXANDER
  • EP3981290A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3981290A1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2C
  • EP3981290A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to a holder 1 for a pair of shoes comprising a first holding part, a second holding part connected to the first holding part, a horizontal adjustment device 50 and a vertical adjustment device 60, wherein the first holding part forms a first shoe receiving surface 10 for a first shoe of the pair of shoes and the second holding part forms a second shoe receiving surface 11 for a second shoe of the pair of shoes, which is spaced apart from the first shoe receiving surface 10 and extends substantially parallel to the first shoe receiving surface 10, wherein the distance of the first shoe receiving surface 10 to the second shoe receiving surface 11 is variably adjustable by means of the vertical adjustment device 60 while maintaining the substantially parallel course and wherein the length of the first shoe receiving surface 10 is variably adjustable by means of the horizontal adjustment device 50.