Automated Shoe Shell Selection via Foot Form Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Shoe manufacturers face difficulties in selecting optimal shoe components that fit users' feet accurately, leading to increased burden and inefficiency in the shoe-making process.

Innovation Solution

A shoe making assistance apparatus that uses foot form data to select and output suitable shell models from various types, reducing the need for manual selection and bonding of shoe components, and includes an input device for accepting foot form data, a computing unit for selecting shell models, and an output device for providing the selected model.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual selection of shoe components is performed by workers, then flexibility in handling various foot geometries is maintained, but workload and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of component selectionVSAvoidtime for shoe making process
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by allowing the shoe making apparatus to automatically select optimal shell components based on measured foot geometry data, eliminating the need for worker intervention in component selection and thereby reducing both workload and time consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical selection process with an automated computing system that uses algorithms to analyze foot geometry data and select appropriate shell components, substituting human labor with computational processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple types of shell models are prepared to fit various foot geometries, then fitting accuracy improves, but device complexity and selection difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefitting accuracyVSAvoidcomplexity of component selection
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from measured foot geometry data to automatically determine the most suitable shell component type, creating a closed-loop process where measurement results directly inform component selection without requiring worker judgment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the selection criterion from subjective worker judgment to objective numerical parameters derived from foot geometry measurements, allowing automated comparison and selection based on quantifiable characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If automated selection system is implemented, then productivity increases, but initial system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshoe making efficiencyVSAvoidcomplexity of assistance apparatus
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The shoe making apparatus is designed with multi-functionality, integrating both measurement capabilities and component selection functions into a single system, allowing it to serve multiple purposes and justify the investment through increased productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP4046516B1Shoe making assistance apparatus
Publication Date: 2023.11.08 ASICS CORP
  • EP4046516B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4046516B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4046516B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A shoe (10) is constituted of an upper (1), a sole (2), and a shell (3) in which the upper (1) and the sole (2) are inserted. A shoe making assistance apparatus (100) that assists making of a shoe includes an input device (106) that accepts foot form data, a processor (102) that selects at least one type of a shell model from among a plurality of types of shell models different in shape based on the foot form data accepted by the input device (106), and an output device (108) that provides output of the shell model selected by the processor (102).