Shoe Sole Arch Zone Elastic Deformation for Foot Damping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current shoe soles either impose an unnatural position on the foot due to rigidity or fail to control foot movement effectively due to softness, lacking in natural damping properties during walking or running.

Innovation Solution

A shoe sole design featuring an arched arch zone, heel zone, outer edge, and inner edge, with a flexible arch zone that flattens under pressure, guiding the foot's natural shape and absorbing energy to enhance damping and propulsion, while a longitudinally arcuate design and optional fulcrum support further control foot movement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the sole is made hard to control foot position, then foot position control is improved, but natural damping properties are suppressed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoot position controlVSAvoidsuppression of natural damping
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The sole transitions from a static rigid structure to a dynamic flexible structure that adapts its shape during foot movement. The arch zone is designed to be flexible and deformable, allowing it to change shape as the foot moves from heel strike to toe-off, providing both control and natural damping through its dynamic response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The sole employs a flexible arch zone that acts as a thin film structure capable of elastic deformation. This flexible region allows the sole to conform to natural foot movement while maintaining control, resolving the contradiction between rigidity for control and flexibility for natural damping.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

2Adaptability or versatility

If the sole is made soft to allow foot movement, then foot movement freedom is improved, but movement control is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoot movement freedomVSAvoidmovement control
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The sole is segmented into different functional zones with distinct properties: a flexible arch zone for movement freedom and a heel zone with specific geometric features for control. This segmentation allows each zone to perform its specialized function without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the sole are given different mechanical properties. The arch zone is made flexible to allow movement, while the heel zone incorporates geometric features (arcuate shape, fulcrum) that provide control during heel strike and body weight transfer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Loss of energy

If the arch zone is made flexible to flatten under pressure, then energy absorption is improved, but structural support is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy absorption for dampingVSAvoidstructural support
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The heel zone is designed with an arcuate (curved) shape that provides structural support through its geometry. The curved shape creates a natural fulcrum point that supports body weight during heel strike, while the overall flexible construction allows energy absorption through deformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The sole provides better control over foot movement, enhances natural damping, reduces the formation of corns or calluses by distributing load evenly, and promotes efficient propulsion through energy absorption and springback properties.

Implementation Method 1

the arch zone is flexible such that it can elastically flatten under the pressure of the foot when the foot is resting on the sole

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the flattening of the arch absorbs energy to cushion the contact of the foot with the ground

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy absorption through deformation: Deformation

Implementation Method 3

a blade 10 of elastic material covered by a layer of padding 11

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic recovery: Elastic Recovery

Data Source

PatentEP2111770B1Sole of a shoe with shock absorbing properties, orthopaedic boot and shoe comprising such a sole.
Publication Date: 2014.06.18 OTTE M CHRISTOPHE
  • EP2111770B1 patent drawingFigure 1~6
  • EP2111770B1 patent drawingFigure 7~10
  • EP2111770B1 patent drawingFigure 11~14

AI summary

The sole (1) has an arched zone extending below an arch of a foot of a user. An external edge (12) and an internal edge (13) extend along external and internal edges of the foot, respectively. The arched zone is arched towards the top between the external and internal edges of the sole. The arched zone is elastically flattened under the pressure of the foot, when the foot is in support on the sole. A large arch deflection is formed towards the front of the arched zone extending under metatarsal bony heads. An elastic strip is covered by a sealing coat. The strip is made of polyoxymethylene such as Delrin(RTM: acetal resin), Hostaform(RTM: polyoxymethylene copolymer), Ultraform(RTM: Acetal polyoxymethylene copolymer) or Kematal(RTM: acetal copolymer).