Shoe Sole with Differential Ground Engaging Formations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Sports shoes often fail to adequately minimize injuries from twisting and turning movements during collisions in contact or non-contact sports, as existing designs do not sufficiently differentiate traction between the front and rear regions to reduce ankle strain.

Innovation Solution

The shoe sole features a distinct arrangement of ground engaging formations, with a rear array having a lower height or depth than the front array, incorporating elongated protrusions, ribs, or studs that are angled or oriented to facilitate lateral movement and reduce the force required for heel displacement during impacts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the rear array of ground engaging formations has the same height as the front array, then uniform ground engagement is achieved, but the heel cannot move laterally with less force during collisions, increasing ankle strain and injury risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelateral heel movementVSAvoidankle strain during collisions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating the height of ground engaging formations between the front and rear arrays of the sole. The rear array has a lesser height than the front array, creating localized variation in ground engagement characteristics. This allows the heel to move laterally with less force during collisions while the front maintains strong ground grip, thereby reducing ankle strain and injury risk without compromising overall stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the rear array of ground engaging formations has a lesser height than the front array, then lateral heel movement is facilitated reducing ankle strain, but uniform ground engagement across the sole is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveankle strain during collisionsVSAvoiduniform ground engagement
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating the height of ground engaging formations between the front and rear arrays of the sole. The rear array has a lesser height than the front array, creating localized variation in ground engagement characteristics. This allows the heel to move laterally with less force during collisions while the front maintains strong ground grip, thereby reducing ankle strain and injury risk without compromising overall stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of manufacture

If traditional uniform ground engaging formations are used across the entire sole, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but injury minimization during twisting and turning movements is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesole manufacturingVSAvoidinjury minimization during collisions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating the height of ground engaging formations between the front and rear arrays of the sole. The rear array has a lesser height than the front array, creating localized variation in ground engagement characteristics. This allows the heel to move laterally with less force during collisions while the front maintains strong ground grip, thereby reducing ankle strain and injury risk without compromising overall stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the sole into distinct front and rear arrays with different ground engaging formation heights. This segmentation allows each region to perform its specific function - the front array provides strong ground grip for propulsion while the rear array facilitates lateral heel movement - thereby improving injury minimization while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances stability and reduces the likelihood of injuries by maintaining ground engagement during collisions, allowing the heel to move laterally with less force, thereby minimizing twisting or turning movements at the ankle.

Implementation Method 1

ground grip or traction for the safety of the player

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS11259597B2Shoe sole
Publication Date: 2022.03.01 SCHUMANN RONALD FREDERICK
  • US11259597B2 patent drawing
  • US11259597B2 patent drawing
  • US11259597B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A shoe sole (100) comprising a bottom surface, the bottom surface having a front array (110) of ground engaging formations having a first height or depth, and a rear array (120) of ground engaging formations having a second height or depth, the rear array of ground engaging formations generally located at a heel portion of the sole, wherein the first height or depth is greater than the second height or depth.