Running Shoe Sole Energy Dissipation via Fluid Transfer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Athletic shoes fail to adequately absorb and dissipate impact energy from foot strikes, leading to repetitive stress injuries, and lack effective cooling mechanisms for increased comfort.

Innovation Solution

A shoe structure featuring compressible members with internal voids containing a working fluid, connected via fluid conduits with flow restriction elements, and integrated resilient structural members for energy dissipation, along with cooling elements and electromagnetic systems for enhanced energy absorption and heat transfer.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If resilient mechanical elements are used to absorb impact energy, then energy dissipation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact energy dissipationVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The shoe structure is divided into multiple independent compressible members (first and second plurality of compressible members) distributed throughout the sole. Each member contains its own working fluid and can be independently compressed during foot strike, allowing energy dissipation to be distributed across multiple simple units rather than one complex mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses pneumatic elements (compressible members containing working fluid) to absorb and dissipate impact energy. The fluid compression and transfer between connected compressible members provides energy dissipation through pressure changes and flow restriction, replacing complex mechanical spring-damper systems with simpler pneumatic components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

2Temperature

If cooling elements are integrated into the shoe structure, then thermal comfort is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoot cooling capabilityVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The working fluid serves multiple functions simultaneously: it acts as both the pneumatic medium for energy absorption in the compressible members and as a cooling agent that circulates through the shoe structure. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate cooling systems, reducing overall device complexity while providing both impact protection and thermal management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The cooling system is merged with the energy absorption system by using the same working fluid for both purposes. The fluid that compresses the pneumatic elements during impact also flows through cooling passages to remove heat from the foot, combining two previously separate functions into a single integrated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Loss of energy

If fluid transfer elements are added to connect compressible members, then energy dissipation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact energy dissipationVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Fluid conduits act as intermediaries connecting the compressible members, allowing working fluid to transfer between them during compression. This fluid-mediated energy transfer and dissipation mechanism is simpler than direct mechanical linkages between compressible elements, as the fluid automatically flows in response to pressure differences without requiring complex valves or actuators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Loss of energy

If flow restriction elements are incorporated into fluid conduits, then energy dissipation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact energy dissipationVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Flow restriction elements modify the flow parameters (restricting fluid flow rate) between compressible members during compression. This passive parameter change creates energy dissipation through flow resistance and pressure drops, eliminating the need for active control mechanisms or complex valve systems while still achieving effective energy absorption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The shoe structure effectively dissipates foot strike energy, reduces stress on the foot, and provides cooling for increased comfort by utilizing fluid transfer and resilient structural elements, as well as electromagnetic energy dissipation, thereby enhancing endurance and reducing injury risk.

Implementation Method 1

the first working fluid is transferred from the related compressible member to the mating compressible member responsive to compression induced by foot strike

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid transfer:

Implementation Method 2

The resilient structural members deform responsive to compression of the foot bed induced by foot strike provide both energy dissipation and resilient recovery

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy dissipation: Damping

Implementation Method 3

The second working fluid additionally bathes the compressible members, conduits and flow restriction elements for heat transfer and energy dissipation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 4

An induction coil encircling the compressible member is operatively connected to a resistive element for energy dissipation responsive to electromagnetically generated current resulting from relative motion of the buoyant magnet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 5

A repelling magnet having opposite polarity to the buoyant magnet is mounted proximate the bottom of the compressible member to prevent bottoming out of the buoyant magnet during compression

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic repulsion: Ion Repulsion/Attraction

Data Source

PatentEP2348910B1Multistructural support system for a sole in a running shoe
Publication Date: 2018.08.29 MCDONNELL KEVIN
  • EP2348910B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2348910B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2348910B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A shoe structure for foot strike energy dissipation employs compressible members having an internal void containing a first working fluid A set of mating compressible members connected to a related one of the first compressible members through a fluid conduit such that the first working fluid is transferred from the related compressible member to the mating compressible member responsive to compression induced by foot strike A sole pad and foot bed intermediately constrain the compressible members Cooling tubes are provided for energy dissipation of the second working fluid which bathes the compressible members, conduits and resilient elements A buoyant magnet carried within the void of at least one compressible member is displaced within the compressible member responsive to foot strike An induction coil encircling the compressible member is operatively connected to a resistive element for energy dissipation responsive to electromagnetically generated current resulting from relative motion of the buoyant magnet