Segmented Shoe Sole Structure for Kicking Flex and Running Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing shoe soles do not adequately balance increased plantarflexion for enhanced kicking performance with stability during running and other athletic movements.

Innovation Solution

A sole structure with a midfoot portion featuring connectors and a resilient component that allows differential bending stiffness in plantarflexion and dorsiflexion directions, enabling increased plantarflexion for kicking while maintaining stability during running.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If the sole structure is made more flexible to allow increased plantarflexion for enhanced kicking performance, then kicking velocity is improved, but stability during running and other athletic movements deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekicking velocityVSAvoidstability during running
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The sole structure is divided into multiple segments including a forefoot portion, a heel portion, and a midfoot portion with multiple connectors. This segmentation allows different regions to have different degrees of flexibility and stability, enabling the forefoot to flex for kicking while the heel and midfoot provide stability during running.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The resilient component is positioned at specific locations within the midfoot portion, creating localized flexibility where needed while maintaining rigidity in other areas. The first resilient component is coupled between specific connectors to provide targeted plantarflexion assistance without compromising overall structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Stability of the object's composition

If the sole structure is made stiffer to provide stability during running, then stability is improved, but plantarflexion capability for kicking deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability during runningVSAvoidplantarflexion capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The sole structure incorporates resilient components that dynamically adjust the stiffness characteristics based on the bending direction. During plantarflexion (kicking), the resilient components allow greater movement, while during dorsiflexion (running), the structure maintains higher stiffness for stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The structure changes its mechanical parameters (bending stiffness) based on the direction of force applied. The midfoot portion is designed with different bending stiffness values for plantarflexion versus dorsiflexion, allowing optimized performance for both kicking and running through parameter variation rather than a fixed stiffness value.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If the resilient component is positioned closer to the forefoot to maximize plantarflexion, then kicking performance is improved, but structural balance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplantarflexion rangeVSAvoidstructural balance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The resilient components are positioned asymmetrically within the midfoot portion, with the first resilient component located at a specific distance from the forefoot and heel portions. This asymmetric positioning optimizes the lever arm for plantarflexion while maintaining overall structural balance and preventing excessive rotation or instability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances kicking velocity by allowing greater plantarflexion while providing stability during dorsiflexion, addressing the limitations of traditional soles that prioritize either flexibility or support.

Implementation Method 1

a resilient component coupled to the first connector and the second connector, wherein the midfoot portion has a resting state in which the resilient component has a first length, wherein, when the midfoot portion bends in a dorsiflexion direction, the first connector and the second connector move away from each other and pull the resilient component to a second length longer than the first length

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS20260026577A1Sole structure for a shoe
Publication Date: 2026.01.29 ADIDAS AG
  • US20260026577A1 patent drawing
  • US20260026577A1 patent drawing
  • US20260026577A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A sole structure for a shoe comprises a forefoot portion and a heel portion. A midfoot portion can be coupled to the forefoot portion and the heel portion. The midfoot portion comprises a plurality of connectors disposed on a ground-facing side of the midfoot portion. The midfoot portion comprises a resilient component coupled to the first connector and the second connector. The resilient component and connectors can alter bending characteristics of the midfoot portion.