Polygonal Shoe Sole Shock Absorber for Shear Deformation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing shock absorbers in shoe soles, such as those made of resin or rubber, lack structural enhancements for improved shock absorption, and existing lattice structures do not fully optimize shear deformation for enhanced shock absorption.

Innovation Solution

A shock absorber with a columnar shape featuring non-intersecting ridgelines defining polygonal end surfaces and connection surfaces, allowing for increased shear deformation and enhanced shock absorption, which can be made of resin or rubber and optionally foam materials, with chamfered or curved surfaces for smoother transitions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional resin or rubber shock absorbers are used in shoe soles, then basic shock absorption is provided, but structural enhancement for improved shock absorption is lacking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock absorption performanceVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The shock absorber is divided into multiple connection surfaces (first, second, third, and fourth connection surfaces) with distinct ridgelines, creating a segmented geometric structure that distributes and enhances shock absorption across different facets while maintaining overall structural integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The shock absorber employs asymmetric polygonal end surfaces where the first end surface has N vertices and the second end surface has M vertices (M > N), creating an asymmetric geometric configuration that optimizes shear deformation patterns for enhanced shock absorption performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Reliability

If existing lattice structures are used to enhance shock absorption, then some structural improvement is achieved, but shear deformation optimization is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock absorption performanceVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The ridgelines connecting the polygonal end surfaces are configured as curved surfaces rather than straight lines, creating smooth transitions between facets that optimize stress distribution and enhance shear deformation characteristics for improved shock absorption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The shock absorber transitions from conventional two-dimensional lattice patterns to a three-dimensional polyhedral structure with multiple angled connection surfaces and ridgelines, adding spatial dimensionality that maximizes shear deformation capacity and shock absorption efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If the shock absorber structure is made more complex to increase shear deformation, then shock absorption improves, but the structure becomes more complicated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock absorption performanceVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple connection surfaces and ridgelines are nested within a single columnar shock absorber body, with each connection surface containing specific ridgelines that are hierarchically organized to maximize shear deformation while maintaining a compact integrated structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

Different connection surfaces are assigned specific ridgeline configurations tailored to their local geometric requirements, with each surface optimized for its particular orientation and function while contributing to the overall shock absorption system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The shock absorber achieves high shock absorption through increased deformability and shear deformation, resulting in a lightweight and effective shock absorbing structure suitable for various applications, including shoe soles and shoes.

Implementation Method 1

allowing for increased shear deformation and enhanced shock absorption

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear deformation: Deformation

Implementation Method 2

The shock absorber achieves high shock absorption through increased deformability and shear deformation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock absorption: Damping

Data Source

PatentUS20250268335A1Shock absorber, shock absorbing structure, shoe sole, and shoe
Publication Date: 2025.08.28 ASICS CORP
  • US20250268335A1 patent drawing
  • US20250268335A1 patent drawing
  • US20250268335A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Shock absorbers, shock absorbing structures, shoe soles and shoes are disclosed herein. In an embodiment, the shoe includes a shoe sole and a show upper. The shoe sole has a first end surface, a second end surface and a circumferential surface. The first end surface has an outer shape of an N-sided polygon. The second end has an outer shape of an M-sided polygon. The circumferential surface includes a plurality of connection surfaces connecting peripheral edges of the first end surface and the second end surface. The plurality of connecting surfaces are defined by a plurality of ridgelines including a first ridgeline extending from a first N vertex to an intermediate vertex, a second ridgeline extending from a first M vertex to the intermediate vertex, and a third ridge line extending from a second N vertex to a second M vertex.