Shopping facility assistance object detection systems, devices and methods

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In modern retail environments, there is a need to enhance customer experience and convenience, particularly during peak hours when staff are overwhelmed, leading to unaddressed customer queries, abandoned shopping carts, messy aisles, incorrect inventory placement, and theft challenges, due to insufficient trained employees and high turnover rates.

Innovation Solution

A shopping assistance system utilizing motorized transport units controlled by a central computer system, which can move through the facility, interact with users, and perform tasks such as retrieving shopping carts, restocking shelves, and navigating around obstacles, to improve operational efficiency and customer satisfaction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If more employees are hired to assist customers during peak hours, then customer service quality improves, but labor cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer service qualityVSAvoidlabor cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service monitoring where sensors automatically detect dropped items and the system autonomously generates notifications to appropriate personnel, eliminating the need for continuous manual surveillance and reducing labor requirements while maintaining reliable detection coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual inspection and monitoring by employees is replaced with an automated sensor-based detection system that uses cameras, weight sensors, and computer vision to identify dropped items, substituting mechanical human labor with automated technological systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If employees are trained more extensively, then customer assistance quality improves, but training time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer assistance qualityVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides real-time feedback to employees through notifications and alerts about dropped items and aisle conditions, enabling them to respond to actual problems rather than relying on extensive preventive training for every scenario

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The detection system performs the complex task of identifying and categorizing dropped items automatically, freeing employees from needing extensive training on detection skills and allowing them to focus on response and customer service

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If manual monitoring of aisles and inventory is increased, then detection accuracy improves, but productivity of other tasks decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidoverall task completion
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring function is segmented into dedicated sensor nodes and detection zones throughout the facility, allowing continuous precise monitoring of specific areas without requiring employee attention across all tasks simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Manual visual inspection and physical monitoring are replaced with automated sensors, cameras, and detection systems that provide continuous precise monitoring without consuming employee time for other productivity tasks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If more security personnel are deployed to prevent theft, then theft prevention improves, but operational cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetheft preventionVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Manual security patrols and surveillance by personnel are replaced with automated detection systems including sensors, cameras, and anomaly detection algorithms that monitor for theft-related behaviors and conditions without requiring additional security staff

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The security monitoring system operates autonomously, detecting and reporting suspicious activities automatically, which reduces the need for human security personnel while maintaining effective theft prevention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10570000B2Shopping facility assistance object detection systems, devices and methods
Publication Date: 2020.02.25 WALMART APOLLO LLC
  • US10570000B2 patent drawing
  • US10570000B2 patent drawing
  • US10570000B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Some embodiments provide apparatuses and methods useful to providing control over movement of motorized transport units. In some embodiments, an apparatus providing control over movement of motorized transport units at a shopping facility comprises: a central computer system comprising: a transceiver; a control circuit; a memory coupled to the control circuit and storing computer instructions that when executed by the control circuit cause the control circuit to perform the steps of: obtain, from one or more of the communications received from the motorized transport unit, route condition information comprising information corresponding to an intended route of travel; obtain additional route condition information detected by one or more detectors external to the motorized transport unit; detect an object affecting the intended route of travel; identify an action to be taken by the motorized transport unit with respect to the detected object; and communicate one or more instructions.