Shopping Trip Recommendations Using Real-Time Inventory Sequencing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing online shopping platforms lack personalized and efficient methods for recommending shopping items and sequences of locations based on user preferences, real-time pricing, and inventory data, leading to suboptimal shopping experiences.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing machine learning models to analyze historical shopping data, user preferences, and real-time data to recommend shopping items and sequences of locations, optimizing for user-defined criteria such as budget and distance, and providing dynamic updates and notifications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional online shopping platforms provide product recommendations, then users can find items of interest, but the recommendations lack personalization and efficiency based on user preferences and real-time data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization of recommendationsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the recommendation process into distinct components: user preference analysis, real-time data processing, machine learning model application, and sequence optimization. Each component handles a specific aspect of the recommendation generation, allowing the complex system to be managed through modular functional blocks that process different data types independently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a multi-functional recommendation platform that simultaneously performs user preference analysis, real-time inventory checking, pricing optimization, location sequencing, and trip routing. This universal system serves multiple shopping objectives (budget optimization, convenience, time efficiency) within a single integrated framework

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If the system analyzes multiple shopping locations and provides optimized sequences, then shopping efficiency improves, but the computational complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshopping efficiencyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of shopping locations, inventory availability, and pricing data before the user makes purchasing decisions. By pre-processing location sequences and predicting optimal shopping routes based on historical data and real-time conditions, the system reduces computational burden during actual shopping execution and enables faster decision-making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts optimization parameters based on user preferences and real-time conditions. It changes weighting parameters for different objectives (budget vs. convenience vs. time), modifies location selection criteria based on inventory updates, and re-sequences shopping stops based on real-time pricing changes, allowing flexible optimization without complete re-computation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the system integrates real-time pricing and inventory data from multiple retailers, then recommendation accuracy improves, but the data collection and processing burden increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation accuracyVSAvoiddata volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the critical real-time data elements needed for recommendation accuracy: current pricing, inventory availability, and location information. It filters out unnecessary data from retailer systems, focusing extraction on specific parameters that directly impact recommendation quality while ignoring redundant information

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Ease of operation

If the system provides multiple optimized trip options based on user criteria, then user satisfaction increases, but the time required to generate and present options increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser satisfactionVSAvoidtrip generation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system generates multiple optimized trip options with different local characteristics: one option optimized for minimum time, another for lowest cost, and a third for fewest stops. Each trip sequence has differentiated local qualities in terms of routing, location selection, and stop ordering, allowing users to quickly compare and select based on their immediate needs without waiting for extensive analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20260065353A1Executing automated shopping tasks
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 STRETCH COLLECTIVE INC
  • US20260065353A1 patent drawing
  • US20260065353A1 patent drawing
  • US20260065353A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems, including computer-readable media, are described for generating recommended shopping trips. A computing system captures individualized shopper preferences associated with a user that include budget constraints and dietary restrictions. The method includes generating a personalized list of shopping items based on the individualized shopper preferences using a predictive recommendation engine and identifying, based on in-store attributes and inventory status, sequences of multiple shopping locations. Each sequence provides access to the shopping items. The method includes rendering the identified sequences on a user interface with contextual navigation aids.