Shoring Wall Anchor Slider Lock for One-Handed Fall Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing anchor devices for shoring walls in construction do not provide a user-friendly and safe solution for preventing falls from height, as they often require significant force to operate and can jam with gloves, posing risks during use.

Innovation Solution

A thumb-operated anchoring device with a sliding part and automatic locking mechanism, featuring a tong closure assembly and compression springs, which allows easy one-handed operation and prevents uncontrolled opening, ensuring secure attachment to shoring walls without releasing the device.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If existing anchor devices are used for shoring walls, then they can provide fall protection, but they require significant force to operate and can jam with gloves

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical locking mechanisms with a magnetic field-based locking system. The magnetic field is generated by a permanent magnet or electromagnet that interacts with a ferromagnetic material in the shoring wall, eliminating the need for complex mechanical components that can jam or require high operating forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fundamental operating parameter from mechanical force application to magnetic field interaction. By utilizing magnetic attraction and repulsion forces, the device achieves reliable locking and unlocking with minimal manual force, and the magnetic field penetration through gloves eliminates the jamming issue entirely.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If complex locking mechanisms are used to prevent uncontrolled opening, then reliability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical locking mechanisms with a magnetic field-based locking system. The magnetic field provides inherent reliability through magnetic attraction that maintains the closed position, while the simplicity of the magnetic system reduces device complexity compared to traditional multi-component mechanical locks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The magnetic locking system is self-regulating through the natural properties of magnetic fields. The magnetic attraction automatically maintains the closed position without requiring additional mechanical components, springs, or latches, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If traditional anchor devices are designed for two-handed operation, then structural strength is maintained, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidstrength
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces two-handed mechanical operation with one-handed magnetic field interaction. The magnetic locking and unlocking can be achieved with a single hand by simply bringing the device close to or away from the shoring wall, significantly improving productivity while the magnetic field strength ensures adequate holding capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic control through magnetic field strength modulation. The electromagnetic system can adjust the magnetic field strength in real-time, allowing the device to maintain strong holding capacity when closed while requiring minimal force for operation, thereby achieving both strength and productivity goals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device can be easily operated with one hand, reduces the risk of glove jamming, requires minimal force for movement, and features an automatic lock that maintains secure attachment, enhancing user safety during construction at heights and meeting safety standards like PN-EN795.

Implementation Method 1

The device contains a set of springs forming an automatic locking of the device which prevents uncontrolled opening of the device during use

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the tongue of the closing part in the closed position of the device forms together with the arm and the upper tab of the body a tong closure assembly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical interlocking: Mechanical Fastener

Data Source

PatentEP3822493B1Anchoring device for shoring walls
Publication Date: 2022.06.22 CBR ROCK MASTER SP Z O O SPK
  • EP3822493B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3822493B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5
  • EP3822493B1 patent drawingFigure 6A~7

AI summary

Invention relates to the anchoring device for shuttering walls consisting of a body containing an arm ending with a top tab, a fastener for at least one connecting piece, a moving closing part seated in the body, pressed down to the closed position in the rest position and a locking part, characterized in that the closing part is a slider (2) with a cutout (6) on one of its lateral surfaces match with the slider lock (3) in the open position of the device, with through pockets (7) and a bottom tab (13) forming together with the arm (11) and the upper tab (12) of the body (1) a tong closure assembly; with a set of springs, of which one pushing spring (8a) is located inside the body (1) directly above the slider lock (3) and is secured from above by a grub screw (9), while three compressive springs (8b, 8c and 8d) are located inside the body (1) in the pass-through pockets (7) of the slider (2).