Shot Packing Method Using Pentagonal Rings and Interstice Filling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cartridge ammunition struggles with achieving high packing density of larger shot while maintaining uniform penetration, as non-spherical shot geometries or mixed spherical shot sizes lead to undesirable over or under penetration.

Innovation Solution

A cartridge ammunition load configuration featuring a shot casing with a combustible propellant charge and wad, where a plurality of first shots form pentagonal rings with a central interstice, and a second shot of a smaller size is placed within these interstices, optimized to achieve a high-density spherical-shot load with uniform shot size distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If non-spherical shot geometries are used to improve packing density, then packing density increases, but penetration uniformity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepacking densityVSAvoidpenetration uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The shot load is segmented into two distinct size categories: larger first shots (e.g., 0.42-0.45 inch diameter) and smaller second shots (e.g., 0.35-0.38 inch diameter). This segmentation allows the larger shots to provide penetration while the smaller shots fill interstices to increase packing density, resolving the contradiction between penetration uniformity and packing density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the shot load have different shot sizes tailored to their specific functions. The larger first shots are positioned to provide penetration capability, while smaller second shots are placed in interstices to maximize space utilization. This local differentiation of shot quality resolves the contradiction between maintaining uniform penetration and achieving high packing density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Quantity of substance

If mixed spherical shot sizes are used to improve packing density, then packing density increases, but penetration uniformity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepacking densityVSAvoidpenetration uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The shot load is segmented into two distinct size categories: larger first shots (e.g., 0.42-0.45 inch diameter) and smaller second shots (e.g., 0.35-0.38 inch diameter). This segmentation allows the larger shots to provide penetration while the smaller shots fill interstices to increase packing density, resolving the contradiction between penetration uniformity and packing density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the shot load have different shot sizes tailored to their specific functions. The larger first shots are positioned to provide penetration capability, while smaller second shots are placed in interstices to maximize space utilization. This local differentiation of shot quality resolves the contradiction between maintaining uniform penetration and achieving high packing density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Quantity of substance

If small diameter shot is used to increase packing density, then packing density increases, but penetration decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepacking densityVSAvoidpenetration
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The shot load is segmented into two distinct size categories: larger first shots (e.g., 0.42-0.45 inch diameter) and smaller second shots (e.g., 0.35-0.38 inch diameter). This segmentation allows the larger shots to provide penetration while the smaller shots fill interstices to increase packing density, resolving the contradiction between penetration uniformity and packing density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention merges two different shot size regimes into a single load configuration. The larger first shots provide penetration capability, while the smaller second shots fill the interstices between the larger shots. This combining of different shot sizes resolves the contradiction between achieving high packing density and maintaining adequate penetration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances packing density and penetration uniformity, suitable for self-defense and hunting applications, with muzzle velocities ranging from 1100 to 1350 fps, and allows for optimal space-filling efficiency in 10 and 12 gauge shells.

Implementation Method 1

a combustible propellant charge disposed at the first end of the shot casing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentUS8651024B2Shot packing method and related devices
Publication Date: 2014.02.18 BOWEN MARK
  • US8651024B2 patent drawing
  • US8651024B2 patent drawing
  • US8651024B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cartridge ammunition load and/or method. Such a load may comprise a shot casing, a combustible propellant charge, a wad, and a plurality of shot. The shot may include shot of a first size and a second size, wherein the second size is within 80-95% of the first size. The first-size shot may be arranged in a stack of one or more planar rings, and may have the second-size shot disposed in a central interstice of one or more of the rings. Embodiments may include any number of layers of shot of the first and second size, and the second-size shot need not be present between every pair of adjacent layers of first-size shot.