Sports Shoulder Pads With Slow-Response Foam Epaulettes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional shoulder pads fail to effectively absorb shocks during sports play due to the lack of resilience in Styrofoam additions, which are crushed upon impact and do not provide adequate protection for the wearer's torso.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating slow-response foam inserts, such as PORONĀ® foam, into the epaulets of the shoulder pads to disperse impact energy and reduce the amount of energy transferred to the body, combined with shock-absorbing liners in the arches and shoulder caps.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If Styrofoam additions are used in epaulets to muffle sound, then sound muffling is improved, but shock absorption capability deteriorates because the foam is crushed at first impact and does not rebound

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesound mufflingVSAvoidshock absorption capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameter from Styrofoam to slow-response foam, which has different viscoelastic properties that allow it to maintain shock absorption capability while still providing sound muffling. The slow-response foam responds gradually to impact forces, maintaining its structural integrity and rebound capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite construction by combining slow-response foam with the epaulet structure, creating a multi-layer system that integrates both sound muffling and shock absorption functions. The foam is positioned within the epaulet to provide both acoustic damping and mechanical cushioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If epaulets are made of hard plastic to maintain structural integrity, then structural strength is improved, but shock absorption capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidshock absorption capability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by incorporating slow-response foam specifically in the epaulet regions where shock absorption is needed, while maintaining the hard plastic structure in areas requiring structural integrity. This localized approach allows different parts of the epaulet to have different material properties optimized for their specific functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite structure combining hard plastic for structural strength and slow-response foam for shock absorption. This composite approach allows the epaulet to simultaneously maintain its structural integrity while providing effective shock absorption during impact events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If separate epaulet padding is added to absorb shock, then shock absorption is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock absorptionVSAvoidepaulet structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the shock absorption function directly into the epaulet structure by incorporating slow-response foam within the epaulet itself, rather than adding separate padding layers. This integration combines multiple functions (structural support, shock absorption, sound muffling) into a single unified component, reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The slow-response foam inserts in the epaulets act as a first line of defense, dispersing impact energy and minimizing the energy absorbed by the main body cushion, thereby enhancing the protective performance and comfort of the shoulder pads.

Implementation Method 1

each of the epaulets containing a shock absorbing insert comprised of slow-response foam, slow-rebound foam or memory foam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscoelasticity: Viscoelasticity

Implementation Method 2

The arches and shoulder caps are in contact with the wearer's body (over the jersey or other basic clothing) and are provided with inner padding to absorb shock

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeformation: Deformation

Data Source

PatentUS10376001B1Sports shoulder pads having epaulettes containing slow-response foam inserts
Publication Date: 2019.08.13 PRO SPORTS GROUP LLC
  • US10376001B1 patent drawing
  • US10376001B1 patent drawing
  • US10376001B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A shoulder pad assembly for protecting the body during sports play has a pair of arches connected to each other in the front and in the back by connecting straps, webs, or similar connectors. Shoulder caps are connected to the arches by a flexible connecting structure, for example, webs, straps, or bands. Epaulets are attached by webs, straps, or bands, at the top of each arch. The arches and shoulder caps are lined with a shock-absorbing liner. Each of the epaulets contains a shock absorbing insert made of slow-response foam, slow-rebound foam or memory foam, encased in a nylon or fabric shell. Redundant pads, made of slow-response foam, slow-rebound foam or memory foam, encased in a nylon or fabric shell may be inserted below the top of each of the left arch and right arch, to provide additional padding in those areas.