Shoulder Stability Evaluation Using Accelerometer and Vibration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for evaluating shoulder joint stability are subjective and lack objective data, relying on examiner experience and providing no normative measures, with imaging techniques only assessing structural integrity but not stress on soft tissues.

Innovation Solution

A system using a three-axis accelerometer attached to the shoulder and a vibrating device to measure a subject's ability to resist vibratory forces, with data processed to classify shoulder stability risk levels compared to normative values.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If physical examination and subjective feedback methods are used to evaluate shoulder stability, then the evaluation process is simple and accessible, but the measurement precision and reliability are low due to examiner experience limitations and lack of normative measures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshoulder stability measurement precisionVSAvoidevaluation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces subjective mechanical physical examination with an objective electronic measurement system using accelerometers and vibratory devices. The accelerometer sensor detects shoulder movement in response to controlled vibrations, converting subjective clinical assessment into quantifiable objective data with normative values for reliable evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a vibratory device as an intermediary between the examiner and the shoulder joint. This intermediary applies controlled vibrations that amplify subtle instability movements, allowing the accelerometer to detect and quantify shoulder stability objectively rather than relying on direct manual physical examination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If MRI and CT imaging techniques are used to assess shoulder structure, then structural integrity can be evaluated, but stress on soft tissues cannot be measured as these techniques only provide static pictures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoft tissue stress measurement precisionVSAvoidimaging procedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from static imaging to dynamic functional assessment. By applying vibratory forces and measuring the shoulder's dynamic response with accelerometers, the system evaluates soft tissue stress and stability under controlled mechanical loading, providing functional information that static images cannot capture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If conventional physical examination tests are used to assess shoulder stability, then the evaluation can be performed during initial assessment, but inter-rater reliability is low and no objective normative measures are available

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshoulder stability evaluation reliabilityVSAvoidevaluation automation level
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements objective feedback through electronic sensors that continuously monitor shoulder movement during vibratory testing. The system provides quantifiable data with normative values, eliminating variability between examiners and establishing reliable, standardized criteria for assessing shoulder stability that can be consistently applied across different clinicians.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Provides objective evaluation of shoulder stability by quantifying the ability to counteract external forces, offering a reliable and standardized assessment of joint stability.

Implementation Method 1

An accelerometer is attached adjacent the subject's shoulder... Data is obtained from the accelerometer over a predetermined length of time

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAccelerometer: Accelerometer

Implementation Method 2

the subject is provided with a vibrating device that is held in the hand of the subject's outstretched arm... the subject's ability to resist vibratory forces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration: Vibration

Data Source

PatentUS20180353123A1System and method for objectively evaluating shoulder joint stability
Publication Date: 2018.12.13 ANDREADIS ANTHONY
  • US20180353123A1 patent drawing
  • US20180353123A1 patent drawing
  • US20180353123A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to objective evaluation of shoulder stability. An accelerometer is attached adjacent the subject's shoulder and the subject is provided with a vibrating device that is held in the hand of the subject's outstretched arm. The subject is instructed to keep his or her arm as still as possible while holding the vibrating device. Data is obtained from the accelerometer over a predetermined length of time. Using a processor, preferably wirelessly connected to the accelerometer, shoulder stability is evaluated in relation to the subject's ability to resist vibratory forces. In an embodiment, the processor evaluates shoulder stability by averaging measured g-forces obtained from the accelerometer along three axes. The average g-forces across each axis are averaged together to give an overall average. The overall average is compared with available normative values to determine the risk level.