Shoulder-Support Chair Structure for Upright Posture Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional chairs fail to maintain an upright posture for individuals with spinal issues, leading to forward bias and potential falling, and existing solutions either complicate the structure or do not adequately support the waist, causing discomfort and increased cost.

Innovation Solution

A chair design featuring a supporter for the shoulder connected to a hip supporter with adjustable armpit and arm supporters, allowing for up-down and forward-rearward rotation, and folding mechanisms to distribute load and reduce spinal pressure, enabling multi-purpose use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional chairs are used, then simplicity and low cost are maintained, but upright posture cannot be maintained and forward bias occurs causing falling accidents

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposture stabilityVSAvoidchair structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The chair is divided into multiple functional segments: hip supporter, shoulder supporter, armpit supporter, and arm supporter. Each segment independently supports a specific body part, allowing the structure to maintain complexity only where needed for posture correction while keeping other areas simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Support features are localized to specific areas where they are most needed: the hip supporter provides base support, the shoulder supporter maintains upper body posture, the armpit supporter prevents forward bias, and the arm supporter reduces shoulder strain. This localized approach improves posture stability without requiring complex structures throughout the entire chair.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If fixed support structures are used, then posture correction is provided, but adaptability to different body shapes and preferences is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport adjustmentVSAvoidadjustment mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The arm supporter is designed with rotational capability around a rotation shaft, allowing it to dynamically adjust between folded and extended positions. This dynamic feature enables the chair to adapt to different user preferences and body types without requiring complex multi-position adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The rotation shaft serves multiple functions: it allows the arm supporter to fold against the shoulder supporter when not needed, enables positional adjustment for different users, and provides structural connection between components. This multi-functionality increases adaptability while minimizing added complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If load is concentrated on shoulder supporter, then upright posture is maintained, but tired feeling increases due to insufficient load distribution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomfort levelVSAvoidposture maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The load support function is segmented across four distinct supporters: the hip supporter bears weight from the lower body, the shoulder supporter maintains upper body posture, the armpit supporter prevents forward bias, and the arm supporter reduces strain on the shoulders. This segmentation distributes the load across multiple body regions, maintaining posture effectiveness while reducing localized fatigue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The armpit supporter acts as an intermediary element between the shoulder supporter and the user's body, providing additional contact points that distribute load more evenly. This intermediary structure prevents the concentration of force on single points, thereby maintaining posture correction while improving comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If multiple support components are added, then posture correction and load distribution are improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposture correction effectivenessVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple support functions are merged into a compact integrated structure where the hip supporter, shoulder supporter, armpit supporter, and arm supporter work together as a unified system. The rotation shaft serves as a common connection point, and the components can be manufactured as separate modular parts that are relatively simple to produce and assemble, reducing overall manufacturing complexity despite the multiple functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10004338B2Chair equipped with supporter for shoulder
Publication Date: 2018.06.26 HA JEONG ROK
  • US10004338B2 patent drawing
  • US10004338B2 patent drawing
  • US10004338B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A chair equipped with shoulder supporter is provided. The chair equipped with shoulder supporter can obtain an effect of attitude remedy by reducing the pressure applied to the spine and by inducing an upright attitude of erecting the waist vertically through a shoulder supporter which is connected to a hip supporter through a base. The shoulder supporter comprises an armpit supporter provided above a vertical supporter. The chair equipped with shoulder supporter can maximize convenience and enable the multi-purpose use by selecting the use and non-use of the arm supporter or the shoulder supporter with the direction change through up-down or forward-rearward direction rotation of the arm supporter or with the folding of the armpit supporter through a rotation shaft.