Showcase Roller Shelf End Cap With Staggered Roller Centers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional showcase roller shelves face challenges in productivity and assembly efficiency due to misalignment of roller units, which affects the smooth sliding of goods and requires frequent replacement of rollers.

Innovation Solution

The end cap for a showcase roller shelf features a design with protrusions of varying lengths across columns, ensuring that each roller unit has a unique rotation center position, allowing for increased contact area and efficient sliding of goods while using standardized rollers across columns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If roller units are arranged in alignment in a single column, then assembly is simplified, but contact area with goods is reduced and sliding efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesliding efficiencyVSAvoidroller arrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a single-column aligned arrangement to a multi-column misaligned arrangement, adding spatial dimensionality to the roller configuration. This dimensional change increases the contact area with goods while maintaining assembly simplicity through standardized end cap components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The end cap employs asymmetric protrusion lengths on different sides to create misaligned roller positions across multiple columns. This asymmetric design enables varied roller center axis positions that increase contact area with goods, while the protrusions themselves remain symmetric in structure for ease of manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Productivity

If roller units are misaligned in multiple columns to increase contact area, then sliding efficiency improves, but assembly complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesliding efficiencyVSAvoidassembly ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The end cap is designed as a universal component that simultaneously supports multiple rollers in misaligned columns. By integrating multiple protrusions of different lengths into a single end cap structure, the patent achieves complex misaligned positioning without requiring multiple different components, thus simplifying assembly while maintaining high sliding efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent varies the protrusion length parameter of the end cap to achieve different roller center axis positions across multiple columns. By changing only the protrusion length parameter while keeping the overall end cap structure standardized, the system achieves misaligned roller arrangements that improve sliding efficiency without significantly increasing assembly complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If protrusions of varying lengths are used in end caps to create misalignment, then roller center axis positions are optimized for sliding, but end cap manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesliding smoothnessVSAvoidend cap manufacturing
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The end cap employs local quality variation through protrusions of different lengths at specific positions, while the overall end cap structure and material remain standardized. This localized variation in protrusion length achieves the required misalignment for smooth sliding without requiring complex manufacturing processes for the entire end cap component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the protrusion length parameter at different locations on the end cap to create misaligned roller positions. By varying only this single geometric parameter while maintaining the same end cap base structure and material, the system achieves optimized sliding smoothness without significantly increasing manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10251493B2End cap for showcase roller shelf
Publication Date: 2019.04.09 SEIDAE IND CO LTD
  • US10251493B2 patent drawing
  • US10251493B2 patent drawing
  • US10251493B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to an end cap for a showcase roller shelf. The end cap for a showcase roller shelf according to an embodiment of the present invention, in a state where roller unit bodies including casings enclosing the outer perimeter of a roller support body are arranged in a plurality of rows, is inserted into and is supported on both ends of each casing while a plurality of rollers are rotatably supported on the roller support body so as to slide a product on the inside of a showcase and move the product to a withdrawal location. The end cap for a showcase roller shelf comprises: cap bodies which are disposed on both ends of each casing so as to face each other, and are installed on locations crossing both ends of each casing disposed in a plurality of rows; and a plurality of protruding bodies which: protrude from locations where the cap bodies face each other so as to be inserted into both ends of each casing disposed in a plurality of rows, wherein the protrusion distances thereof are adjusted so that the rollers arranged in a plurality of rows in locations where the plurality of casings are inserted are positioned at locations where rotation centers are different in each row; and protrude alternately repeatedly while the protrusion distances thereof, by which an adjacent row among a plurality of row locations is supported, are different from each other.