Handheld Shower Magnetic Docking Tab Lip Retention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Handheld showers with magnetic docking often accidentally undock, posing challenges in securing them effectively.

Innovation Solution

A handheld shower system incorporating magnetic docking with a mechanical retention feature, where the handheld unit is retained on a cradle by a tab and lip mechanism that engages when a downward force is applied, ensuring secure docking and easy undocking with an upward force.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If magnetic docking is used to secure the handheld shower on the cradle, then the ease of operation is improved, but the reliability deteriorates due to accidental undocking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of dockingVSAvoidsecurity of docking
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines magnetic docking with a mechanical tab-lip retention mechanism. The magnet provides initial attraction and easy docking, while the tab on the cradle engages with the lip on the handheld to prevent accidental undocking. This merging of magnetic and mechanical retention systems resolves the contradiction by maintaining ease of operation through magnetic attraction while adding reliability through mechanical engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The docking mechanism uses composite retention methods combining magnetic fields and mechanical structures. The magnetically attractable material (such as a magnetically attractable ball) works in conjunction with the mechanical tab-lip interface to create a hybrid retention system that provides both ease of operation and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If a mechanical retention feature is added to prevent accidental undocking, then the reliability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity of dockingVSAvoidcomplexity of docking mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The docking mechanism is segmented into distinct functional components: the magnetic attraction system and the mechanical tab-lip retention system. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function independently, simplifying the overall design while maintaining reliability. The tab is a simple protruding feature on the cradle that engages with a corresponding lip on the handheld, avoiding complex locking mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The tab-lip mechanical retention feature automatically engages when the handheld is placed on the cradle. The downward force applied during docking causes the tab to contact the lip and secure the handheld in place without requiring additional user actions or complex control mechanisms. The system self-regulates based on the applied force direction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If the tab contacts the lip under downward force to retain the handheld, then the reliability is improved, but the ease of operation worsens due to requiring upward force for undocking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of accidental undockingVSAvoidease of undocking
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The tab-lip retention mechanism is designed to be dynamic rather than static. The tab only contacts and engages with the lip when downward force is applied during docking. When upward force is applied for undocking, the tab naturally disengages from the lip, allowing easy removal. This dynamic behavior based on force direction resolves the contradiction by providing security during normal use while maintaining ease of undocking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of requiring a locking mechanism that must be actively unlocked, the design inverts the approach: the retention mechanism is passive during docking (tab contacts lip under downward force) and automatically releases during undocking (tab does not contact lip under upward force). This inversion simplifies operation by eliminating the need for active unlocking actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides secure retention of the handheld shower on the cradle during use while allowing easy detachment, enhancing user convenience and preventing accidental undocking.

Implementation Method 1

One of the handheld and the cradle includes a magnet, and the other of the handheld and the cradle includes a magnet or a magnetically attractable material. The handheld is docked on the cradle by attraction of the magnet of one of the handheld and the cradle to the magnet or the magnetically attractable material of the other of the handheld and the cradle.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic attraction: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentUS9919331B2Handheld shower system
Publication Date: 2018.03.20 FORTUNE BRANDS WATER INNOVATIONS LLC
  • US9919331B2 patent drawing
  • US9919331B2 patent drawing
  • US9919331B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a handheld shower system with magnetic docking and a mechanical retention feature.