Shredder Knife Asymmetry for Axial Thrust Balancing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current shredder designs face high production and maintenance costs due to the generation of significant axial thrust from equally-oriented force reactions on fixed knives, requiring oversized and expensive thrust-bearings, which limits the structural simplicity and efficiency of the machine.

Innovation Solution

The shredder design balances reaction forces on fixed knives by positioning them in a way that the axial thrust is canceled out, using a table with metal sheets that support fixed knives orthogonally to the shaft axis, allowing for a more balanced distribution of forces and reduced bearing loads, and enabling the use of larger or thinner metal sheets based on the angle of inclination.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If fixed knives are positioned with equally-oriented force reactions on the same face of rotating knives, then material cutting effectiveness is improved, but axial thrust on the shaft increases requiring expensive and bulky thrust-bearings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial cutting effectivenessVSAvoidaxial thrust on shaft
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by positioning fixed knives on both faces of the rotating knife in opposite orientations. Specifically, fixed knives are arranged such that one set acts on the first face of the rotating knife while another set acts on the second face, creating an asymmetric force distribution that balances the axial thrust. This allows the force reactions to counterbalance each other, eliminating the need for bulky thrust-bearings while maintaining cutting effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Strength

If shafts and knives are oversized to handle the axial thrust, then structural strength is improved, but production and maintenance costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidproduction and maintenance costs
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs the counterweight principle by arranging fixed knives to create opposing force reactions that balance the axial thrust. The fixed knives are positioned such that the force generated on one face of the rotating knife is counterbalanced by an equal and opposite force on the other face. This force balancing allows the use of normally sized shafts and knives without oversizing them for thrust handling, thereby reducing production and maintenance costs while maintaining adequate structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

3Device complexity

If vertical metal sheets are used to support fixed knives orthogonally to the shaft axis, then structural simplicity is improved, but flexibility in knife disposition is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural simplicityVSAvoidflexibility in knife disposition
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dimensionality change by transitioning from supporting fixed knives only on vertical metal sheets (one-dimensional support) to using inclined metal sheets that provide support in multiple orientations (multi-dimensional support). The inclined sheets allow fixed knives to be positioned at various angles and locations relative to the shaft axis, enabling more flexible knife dispositions while maintaining structural simplicity. This dimensional expansion of the support structure provides greater adaptability in knife arrangement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces the need for heavy-duty bearings, lowers production and maintenance costs, extends the working life of rotating knives, and allows for a more modular and cost-effective shredder design with improved material processing efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

the material to be chipped is hooked by the rotary knife and sliced against the adjacent fixed knife

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear force: Shear Stress

Implementation Method 2

the comminuted parts fall by gravity and are collected below the table

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentEP3000532B1Shredder machine for waste material
Publication Date: 2019.05.08 FOR REC SRL
  • EP3000532B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3000532B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3000532B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

A shredder machine (MC) for waste material is disclosed. It comprises a table (60) equipped with fixed knives (22, 24); a shaft (30a) rotatably mounted on the table and equipped with an array of rotating knives (20a) which are axially spaced and radially projecting from the shaft; wherein the rotary knives have a face (36a) adjacent to, and adapted to cooperate with, a fixed knife (24) for cutting the material. To prevent axial imbalance of forces, the machine comprises a pair of fixed knives (22, 24) where one (22) is adjacent to, and adapted to cooperate with, a face (28a) of a rotating knife and the other (24) is adjacent to, and adapted to cooperate with, the opposite face (36a) of the same rotating knife.