Compostable Material Shredder With Reversible Cutting Inserts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing shredding devices for compostable materials face issues such as prolonged downtimes due to the need for tool removal and re-sharpening, especially in mobile applications, and inefficiencies when processing waste with high green content, including material jams.

Innovation Solution

The design features primary and secondary cutting tools arranged on the working cylinder, with secondary tools pivotable to disengage and re-engage, and cutting edges that can be reversed for continued use, allowing for efficient shredding and minimizing downtime through easy blade exchange.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If cutting tools are rigidly attached to the working cylinder, then they are constantly in engagement with the material, but they are subject to wear and tear and require removal for resharpening, causing downtime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous operationVSAvoiddowntime for tool removal and resharpening
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting tool is divided into a body portion and a separate cutting edge portion (insert). The insert can be detached, replaced, or reversed independently from the tool body, allowing quick changes without removing the entire tool from the working cylinder. This segmentation enables continuous operation by allowing rapid insert replacement when cutting edges become worn.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting insert is designed to be disposable or reversible. When one cutting edge becomes worn, the insert can be quickly replaced with a fresh one or flipped to use the opposite cutting edge. This approach recovers the tool body for continued use while discarding or temporarily setting aside the worn insert, minimizing downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

2Productivity

If cutting edges are arranged to always point in the direction of rotation, then they are constantly in engagement with the material, but the tool must be removed to resharpen them

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshredding efficiencyVSAvoiddifficulty of tool maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting tool is segmented into a reusable body and a replaceable insert with cutting edges. This allows the cutting edges to be maintained (by replacement or reversal) without removing the entire tool assembly from the working cylinder, significantly easing maintenance while preserving continuous shredding efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting insert is designed with cutting edges on opposite sides. When one set of cutting edges becomes worn, the insert is flipped around to present the opposite cutting edges, which are still sharp. This inversion allows continued use of the same insert body, simplifying maintenance to a simple flip operation rather than complete tool removal and resharpening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Loss of time

If cutting plates are detached and fastened again after turning over, then cutting edges can be reused, but the process is very time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedowntime for blade replacementVSAvoidease of blade exchange
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting insert is segmented from the tool body and designed with a quick-release mechanism. This allows the insert to be detached and reattached rapidly without complex fastening operations, reducing the time required for blade replacement while maintaining ease of operation through simple, tool-free or minimal-tool changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of detaching and reattaching the entire cutting plate, the insert is simply flipped around in place. This inversion operation is much quicker than complete removal and reattachment, significantly reducing downtime while keeping the operation simple and easy to perform.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Productivity

If secondary cutting tools are stationary relative to primary cutting tools, then material is shredded between them, but they cannot disengage to avoid material jams

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial processing efficiencyVSAvoidsusceptibility to material jams
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The secondary cutting tool carrier is made dynamic rather than stationary. It can pivot or move relative to the primary cutting tools on the working cylinder. This dynamic capability allows the secondary tools to disengage from the material flow when jams are detected, preventing further jams and allowing quick clearing, while maintaining stationary engagement during normal efficient shredding operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP2374544B1Device for grinding compostable material
Publication Date: 2018.05.30 J WILLIBALD MASCHFAB
  • EP2374544B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2374544B1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2b
  • EP2374544B1 patent drawingFigure 2c

AI summary

The device has primary cutting tools (6) arranged on a casing surface of a working cylinder (5) that rotates in a preset direction. Secondary cutting tools (8.1-8.3) are arranged in a secondary cutting tool carrier (7), where material is crushed between the primary and secondary tools. The carrier concentrically encloses the cylinder and extends tills to a discharge area (A) for the material. The secondary tools are arranged in an inlet area (E) and the discharge area, where form of the secondary tools and/or positions of the secondary tools on the carrier are different in the areas.