Shredder Sensor Calibration for False Positive Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing shredders face issues with false positive signals due to varying electrical characteristics and sensitivities of optical sensors, leading to unreliable detection of articles and bin fullness, causing unnecessary shredder activation or deactivation, and increased wear on the mechanism.

Innovation Solution

A shredder system with sensors that emit and detect radiation, featuring automatic calibration to adjust the intensity of the radiation beam to ensure reliable detection of articles and shredded particles, preventing false positives and optimizing shredder operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the drive signal intensity is increased to detect single sheet paper, then paper detection sensitivity is improved, but false positive signals increase causing unnecessary shredder activation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepaper detection sensitivityVSAvoidfalse positive rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calibration before normal operation to establish the baseline radiation intensity and detection threshold. The controller stores calibration data and uses it to adjust subsequent detection operations, preventing false positives while maintaining sensitivity to single sheets of paper.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the radiation intensity parameter based on calibration data. By changing the drive signal intensity from a fixed value to a calibrated value, the system optimizes detection sensitivity while eliminating false positives caused by inappropriate intensity levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the drive signal intensity is decreased to reduce false positives, then reliability is improved, but paper detection sensitivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse positive rateVSAvoidpaper detection sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calibration before normal operation to establish the baseline radiation intensity and detection threshold. The controller stores calibration data and uses it to adjust subsequent detection operations, preventing false positives while maintaining sensitivity to single sheets of paper.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the radiation intensity parameter based on calibration data. By changing the drive signal intensity from a fixed value to a calibrated value, the system optimizes detection sensitivity while eliminating false positives caused by inappropriate intensity levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If radiation intensity is increased to detect shredded particles, then bin full detection sensitivity is improved, but false positive signals from dust and oil residues increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebin full detection sensitivityVSAvoidfalse positive rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calibration when the bin is empty to establish the baseline radiation intensity. This calibration accounts for dust and oil residues present during normal operation, creating a reference point that distinguishes actual bin fullness from contamination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The controller continuously compares current radiation intensity readings against the calibrated baseline and adjusts detection decisions accordingly. This feedback mechanism allows the system to maintain high sensitivity while compensating for dust and oil residues that would otherwise cause false positives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If radiation intensity is decreased to reduce false positives from dust and oil, then reliability is improved, but bin full detection sensitivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse positive rateVSAvoidbin full detection sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calibration when the bin is empty to establish the baseline radiation intensity. This calibration accounts for dust and oil residues present during normal operation, creating a reference point that distinguishes actual bin fullness from contamination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The controller continuously compares current radiation intensity readings against the calibrated baseline and adjusts detection decisions accordingly. This feedback mechanism allows the system to maintain high sensitivity while compensating for dust and oil residues that would otherwise cause false positives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively reduces false positive signals, ensuring accurate detection of articles and bin fullness, thereby preventing unnecessary shredder operation and extending the mechanism's lifespan by maintaining optimal sensor performance.

Implementation Method 1

a sensor for emitting and detecting radiation. The sensor consists of either (a) a throat sensor operable to detect insertion of the at least one article into the throat based on interruption of the radiation by the at least one article, or (b) a waste level sensor operable to detect an accumulation of shredded particles discharged by the shredder mechanism based on an interruption of the radiation on the accumulated shredded particles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadiation emission and detection: Light

Data Source

PatentUS7823815B2Shredder with self adjusting sensor
Publication Date: 2010.11.02 FELLOWES INC
  • US7823815B2 patent drawing
  • US7823815B2 patent drawing
  • US7823815B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein is a shredder having a throat for receiving at least one article to be shredded therethrough and a shredder mechanism received in a shredder housing which is driven to shred the at least one article fed therein. At least one sensor emits and detects radiation to detect the presence of the at least one article or shredded particles. The sensor communicates with a controller to operate the shredder mechanism. The controller also calibrates an intensity of the radiation of the sensor(s) to or within a predetermined amount above a minimum level in order to reduce wear and run-on conditions.