Shredding Rotor Cutting Tool Mounting for Robust Force Transfer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cutting tools for shredding rotors lack robustness, ease of assembly, and reliable operation, particularly in applications involving wood, soil, and rock shredding.

Innovation Solution

A cutting tool design featuring angled sub-sections in the mounting area, a wedge-shaped groove, and a screw connection for secure attachment to a base element, allowing effective force distribution and easy assembly/disassembly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional mounting area design is used, then the cutting tool can be attached to the base element, but the connection lacks robustness and reliability under operating forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection reliabilityVSAvoidmounting strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting area is designed with two sub-areas oriented at an angle greater than 90 degrees to each other, creating an asymmetric configuration that optimally distributes operating forces. This asymmetric angular arrangement prevents uniform stress concentration and enhances both the strength and reliability of the connection between cutting tool and base element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Strength

If a robust mounting design is implemented, then the cutting tool can withstand operating forces, but the assembly and disassembly process becomes complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting strengthVSAvoidease of assembly
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting area is segmented into two distinct sub-areas with different orientations, allowing the connection to withstand forces from multiple directions independently. This segmentation enables a simple screw connection to achieve robust mounting without complex assembly procedures, as each sub-area handles specific force components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If the cutting tool is designed for easy assembly, then the mounting process is simplified, but the connection may not reliably transfer operating forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of assemblyVSAvoidconnection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The asymmetric angular arrangement of the two sub-areas creates optimal force distribution paths that enhance connection reliability. This geometric configuration ensures that operating forces are effectively transferred to the base element through the simplified screw connection, maintaining both ease of assembly and high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

4Ease of manufacture

If a simple mounting area design is used, then manufacturing is easier, but the cutting tool lacks durability under heavy loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidservice life
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Dividing the mounting area into two functional sub-areas with specific angular orientations optimizes force distribution without significantly complicating manufacturing. This segmentation enhances durability and service life by preventing stress concentration, while remaining compatible with standard manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP4663303A1Cutting tool and cutting system for a shredding rotor
Publication Date: 2025.12.17 PRINOTH GMBH
  • EP4663303A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4663303A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4663303A1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The invention relates to a cutting tool for a shredding rotor (12), in particular for shredding wood and/or soil, comprising at least one cutting edge (22) and at least one mounting area (36), which is preferably at least partially designed as a mounting recess having two sub-areas (38, 40) extending longitudinally and oriented at an angle to each other. It is proposed that the sub-areas (38, 40) enclose an angle (A) greater than 90 degrees.