Shrimp Processing with Precision Heading and Mud Vein Severing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing shrimp processing methods result in high meat loss and inefficiencies due to manual handling and automated equipment that fails to accurately size, sort, and remove mud veins, leading to reduced revenue.

Innovation Solution

A shrimp processing system with automated stations for measuring, heading, and severing mud veins, using a conveying system to transfer shrimp between stations, and clamps to securely hold shrimp for precise processing, including mud vein severing, heading, and peeling, while minimizing meat loss.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated peeling and deveining equipment is used, then processing speed and productivity are improved, but meat loss increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidmeat loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary measurement of shrimp length and identification of mud vein location before the peeling and deveining operations. This allows the subsequent processing to be precisely targeted, avoiding unnecessary removal of meat and reducing overall meat loss while maintaining high processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system adjusts processing parameters based on measured shrimp characteristics. By changing operational parameters according to the specific size and anatomy of each shrimp, the equipment can process shrimp efficiently while minimizing meat loss through precise, adaptive control of the peeling and deveining forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If automated heading equipment is used, then processing efficiency is improved, but meat loss increases due to inaccurate head removal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidmeat loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary measurement of shrimp length to identify the precise location of the carapace-abdomen junction before heading. This preliminary measurement enables the heading operation to be accurately positioned, ensuring that only the head is removed while preserving all abdominal meat, thus improving efficiency without increasing meat loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of substance

If manual processing is used, then meat loss is minimized, but processing time and labor costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeat lossVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback loops where measurement data from optical sensors is used to control the subsequent processing operations. The measured shrimp characteristics feed into the control system, which adjusts the peeling and deveining operations in real-time, achieving precision comparable to manual processing while maintaining automated processing speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical processing with automated optical measurement and controlled mechanical processing. Optical sensors measure shrimp characteristics, and this information controls automated processing mechanisms, substituting the skilled manual mechanical operations with a combination of optical detection and controlled mechanical action that achieves both precision and speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of operation

If automated equipment processes all shrimp uniformly, then processing simplicity is improved, but measurement and sorting accuracy decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing simplicityVSAvoidsize sorting accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different processing parameters to different local regions of each shrimp based on measured characteristics. Rather than uniform processing, the system identifies specific features such as mud vein location and carapace junction point for each individual shrimp, and applies processing forces localized to those specific regions, maintaining both operational simplicity and measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20260033502A1Shrimp processing apparatus and methods
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 NOVA TECH ENG INC
  • US20260033502A1 patent drawing
  • US20260033502A1 patent drawing
  • US20260033502A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Shrimp processing apparatus to remove pleopods of individual shrimp, along with methods for removing pleopods of individual shrimp are described herein. The shrimp processing apparatus may be provided in systems may include one or more processing stations configured to perform one or more of the following functions on each shrimp individually: measurement of individual shrimp, heading of individual shrimp, peeling of individual shrimp, and severing the mud vein of individual shrimp.