Shrimp Peeling Device with Narrowing Cavity and Cutting Assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing shrimp peeling methods, both manual and machine-based, suffer from low efficiency, incomplete peeling, and high operational costs due to the need for precise shrimp positioning and lengthy processing times.

Innovation Solution

A shrimp peeling device comprising a frame, driving member, conveying wheels, clamping frame, cutting assembly, and shell removing frame, which clamps and conveys shrimp vertically, cuts the back or abdomen, and uses a narrowing cavity to squeeze out the meat, allowing for efficient peeling without precise shrimp positioning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual peeling is used, then operational simplicity is maintained, but production efficiency is low and worker safety is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The shrimp automatically clamps onto the conveying belt and positions itself during transmission, eliminating the need for manual positioning operations while maintaining operational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual peeling operations are replaced by an automated mechanical system comprising conveying belts, cutting assemblies, and squeezing mechanisms that perform peeling without direct worker intervention, thereby improving productivity while maintaining ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Extent of automation

If traditional machine peeling with rotating rollers is used, then peeling automation is achieved, but processing time is excessive and peeling completeness is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepeeling automationVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The peeling process is segmented into distinct stages: clamping, conveying, cutting, and squeezing, with each stage performed by dedicated components operating in sequence, reducing total processing time while maintaining automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The shrimp is pre-clamped and positioned on the conveying belt before entering the cutting and squeezing zones, eliminating the need for lengthy positioning adjustments during the peeling process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If semi-automatic peeling with precise positioning is used, then peeling completeness is improved, but device complexity and operational difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepeeling completenessVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The shrimp self-positions on the conveying belt through its natural clamping action, eliminating the need for complex positioning mechanisms while achieving complete peeling through the subsequent cutting and squeezing operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Extent of automation

If semi-automatic peeling is used, then automation is partially achieved, but production efficiency remains low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The conveying belt continuously transports shrimp through all processing stages without interruption, and the automated cutting and squeezing operations occur in continuous sequence, maximizing production efficiency through uninterrupted automated processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device achieves high production efficiency by simplifying the peeling process, reducing operational costs, and ensuring complete peeling without shell residues, thus enabling large-scale promotion.

Implementation Method 1

the narrowing cavity narrows the conveying belt to squeeze the shrimp to obtain shrimp meat outputted through the discharge port and a shrimp shell carried away through the conveying belt

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentUS12219967B2Shrimp peeling device
Publication Date: 2025.02.11 DENSEA AQUATIC TECH (HUAZHOU) CO LTD
  • US12219967B2 patent drawing
  • US12219967B2 patent drawing
  • US12219967B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A shrimp peeling device includes a frame, a driving member, a first conveying wheel, a second conveying wheel, a conveying belt, a clamping frame, a cutting assembly, and a shell removing frame. The conveying belt is in transmission connection with the first conveying wheel and the second conveying wheel. The clamping frame is provided with a first pathway for the conveying belt to pass through. A processing opening is formed in the clamping frame. The cutting assembly is disposed at the processing opening. The shell removing frame is provided with a second pathway for the conveying belt to pass through, and the second pathway includes a limiting cavity and a narrowing cavity. The shell removing frame is provided with a discharge port. The conveying belt is upwards bent and folded in half to clamp and convey a shrimp.