Shrink-Fit Chuck Cooling Attachment with Liquid Coolant Suction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing devices for cooling shrink chucks are either inefficient with compressed air or require complex designs for liquid coolant collection and drying, lacking a simple and cost-effective solution for rapid cooling across different sizes.

Innovation Solution

A device with a liquid coolant supply system and suction unit that sucks off the coolant from the cooling attachment, allowing for effective and rapid cooling without the need for complex collection systems, and can be used for various shrink fit chuck diameters, with optional integration of an induction device for shrinking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If compressed air is used for cooling the shrink chuck, then the cooling process is simple, but the cooling effect is limited and slow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of cooling systemVSAvoidcooling speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a two-phase cooling approach: first using compressed air (pneumatic) for initial cooling, then transitioning to liquid coolant (hydraulic) for rapid heat removal. The system switches from gas-based cooling to liquid-based cooling to achieve both simplicity and high cooling efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical state and properties of the coolant from gas (compressed air) to liquid (coolant liquid) to dramatically improve the cooling effect. This parameter change allows the system to achieve rapid cooling while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If liquid coolant is sprayed on the shrink chuck with a pot-shaped container for shielding, then rapid cooling is achieved, but the design becomes complex requiring collection containers and drying devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling speedVSAvoidcomplexity of coolant collection and drying system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the coolant collection function from the cooling attachment itself and relocates it to a separate, movable collection container. This separation allows the cooling attachment to remain simple while still achieving rapid cooling with liquid coolant.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic, movable components (the collection container that can be moved into position) rather than fixed, complex integrated systems. This dynamic approach reduces the permanent structural complexity while maintaining effective coolant collection and drying capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If a single cooling attachment is designed to accommodate different shrink chuck diameters, then versatility is improved, but the gap between attachment wall and chuck wall increases reducing cooling efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverange of chuck diametersVSAvoidcooling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the cooling system into modular components, including interchangeable or adjustable cooling elements that can be positioned at optimal distances from the chuck surface. This segmentation allows maintaining effective cooling gaps while accommodating various chuck diameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal cooling attachment design that can handle multiple chuck sizes through adjustable or interchangeable components. The system maintains cooling effectiveness across different diameters by allowing flexible configuration of the cooling elements relative to the chuck surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient and rapid cooling of shrink fit chucks, ensuring they are dry post-cooling, and allows for a single cooling attachment to be used across a wide diameter range, with the option to also facilitate shrinking.

Implementation Method 1

air being sucked in at the underside of the cooling attachment by the suction unit via the suction line. The air sucked in entrains the liquid coolant and transports it to a collection container.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAir entrainment: Entrainment

Implementation Method 2

The liquid coolant, through which a particularly effective and rapid cooling of the shrink fit chuck can be achieved

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 3

a pump with the help of which it generates a carrier gas flow, which is charged with a liquid cooling medium, so that a coolant flow consisting predominantly of the carrier gas in terms of volume is created

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Data Source

PatentEP2814634B1Apparatus for cooling a shrink-fit chuck
Publication Date: 2020.07.15 FRANZ HAIMER MASCHINENBAU KG
  • EP2814634B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2814634B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2814634B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

An apparatus for cooling a shrink-fit chuck, having a cooling attachment that can be placed on the shrink-fit chuck and contains a plurality of feed openings for supplying a coolant into an interior of the cooling attachment. Connected to the cooling attachment are a device for feeding a liquid coolant into the interior of the cooling attachment and a suction-extraction device for the suction-extraction of the liquid coolant used for cooling the shrink-fit chuck from the interior of the cooling attachment.