Shrinking Shock Strut for Landing Gear

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aircraft landing gear systems require heavy mechanical linkages and high hydraulic fluid flow rates to shrink struts during retraction, which can increase the landing gear envelope and are not independent of the retract actuator, limiting space efficiency and flexibility.

Innovation Solution

A compact shrinking shock strut system that operates independently of the retract actuator, using a transfer device to 'step-down' hydraulic pressure and provide a higher hydraulic fluid flow rate, eliminating the need for heavy mechanical linkages and integrating a hydraulic compensator to maintain pressure and fluid volume.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of moving object

If heavy mechanical linkages are used to exert axial shrinking force on the strut, then the strut can be shrunk during retraction, but the landing gear envelope increases and the system becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrut lengthVSAvoidlanding gear envelope
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces heavy mechanical linkages with a hydraulic system. A hydraulic actuator uses fluid pressure to generate the axial shrinking force on the strut, eliminating the need for complex mechanical linkage systems while achieving the same shrinking function with reduced space requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a hydraulic system where hydraulic fluid is directed to an actuator that converts hydraulic pressure into mechanical force for shrinking the strut. This hydraulic approach provides a compact, high-force solution that reduces the landing gear envelope compared to mechanical linkage systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

2Length of moving object

If high hydraulic fluid flow rates are used to shrink the strut, then the shrinking function is achieved, but the hydraulic system requirements increase and the system becomes less compatible with standard aircraft hydraulic systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrut lengthVSAvoidhydraulic fluid flow rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the hydraulic system parameters by using a hydraulic actuator with a large piston area that converts standard hydraulic pressure into high force. This allows the system to achieve strut shrinking with conventional hydraulic flow rates rather than requiring high flow rates, making it compatible with standard aircraft hydraulic systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by designing the hydraulic actuator with a large piston area at the point where force is needed, allowing the conversion of moderate flow rate at high pressure into the high force required for strut shrinking, thus maintaining compatibility with standard hydraulic systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Extent of automation

If the shrinking system is mechanically linked to the retract actuator, then the system is integrated, but the shrinking operation cannot be controlled independently from retraction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindependent operation capabilityVSAvoidsystem integration
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the landing gear system into independent functional modules: the retract actuator for retraction/deployment and the hydraulic actuator for shrinking. This segmentation allows each function to be controlled independently through separate hydraulic control valves, enabling independent operation while maintaining system integration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient and compact strut shortening without increasing the landing gear envelope, allowing for independent operation and reduced hydraulic demand, while maintaining strut length control and fluid volume stability.

Implementation Method 1

The transfer device transfers hydraulic fluid to the strut shrink chamber independent of movement of the retract actuator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic pressure: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 2

the pressurized gas that was transferred to the transfer cylinder drives the transfer fluid from the strut shrink chamber back into the transfer cylinder. As the transfer fluid exits the strut shrink chamber, the pressurized gas returns to the strut from the transfer cylinder and causes the strut to return to its extended length

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas pressure: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentEP2179921B1Shrinking shock strut system for retractable landing gear
Publication Date: 2017.06.28 GOODRICH CORP
  • EP2179921B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP2179921B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2179921B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

A shrinking shock strut (11) system for an aircraft landing gear (10) having a retract actuator (17) that is moveable in length to deploy or retract the landing gear (10), that includes a shrink strut (11) and a transfer device. The shrink strut (11) may be compressed in length for stowage in the fuselage. The transfer device may be in closed fluid communication with the strut shrink (11) for transferring and receiving hydraulic fluid to and from the strut shrink (11). When actuated by an aircraft hydraulic system independent of any motion of the retract actuator (17), the transfer device may drive hydraulic fluid to the strut shrink thereby compressing or shrinking the shrink strut (11) to a partially compressed length.